| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Keith Dysart wrote:
I offer you the same challenge as Cecil, find the error in my analysis and then compute the correct amount of re-reflection. We will be glad to do that if you will provide the impedance value encountered by the reflected wave with the source turned on. You have not yet done that. Hint: It doesn't matter what impedance the reflected wave encounters with the source turned off since reflected waves are non-existent during that condition. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| The power explanation | Antenna | |||
| again a few words of explanation | General | |||
| again a few words of explanation | Policy | |||
| Explanation wanted | Antenna | |||
| New ham needing explanation on radios | General | |||