Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The loss of real coax often doesn't fit simplified models for at least
the following reasons: 1. Plated or tinned center conductor, where plating or tinning is thinner than several skin depths at the lowest frequency of analysis. 2. Roughness of a stranded center conductor. 3. Roughness of a braided shield and the necessity for the current to migrate from wire bundle to wire bundle. 4. Shield thickness which is less than several skin depths at the lowest frequency of analysis. 5. Tinned shield. 6. Multiple shields. Numbers 1, 4, and 5 can be calculated, but require modified Bessel functions and often some mathematical trickery to prevent truncation or overflow errors even with extended precision calculation. The remainder are often empirically determined, are complex functions of frequency, and vary from one cable type or manufacturer to another. All can be significant with typical cables at HF. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Reflection Coefficient | Antenna | |||
Uses of Reflection Coefficient Bridges. | Antenna | |||
Reflection Coefficient Challenge Solved | Antenna | |||
Reflection Coefficient Smoke Clears a Bit | Antenna | |||
Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? | Antenna |