LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #25   Report Post  
Old April 7th 07, 03:49 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 233
Default Not understanding some parts of wave refraction

On Fri, 06 Apr 2007 16:29:07 -0700, Jim Kelley wrote:

Roy Lewallen wrote:

As others have pointed out, it's risky to treat c as a variable or
medium-dependent speed.


Roy -

The convenient thing about using medium dependent c in that equation
is that we can use things such as index of refraction or velocity
factor to convert from vacuum 'c' to 'c' in another medium. The fact
that it makes the results of the calculation more accurate tends to
mitigate any risk that might be encumbered when using it.

To require that only vacuum c be used in the equation to me seems
overly authoritarian. I wonder how you feel about the speed of sound? :-)

73, Jim AC6XG


The speed of sound in a vacuum is measured using the sound of one hand clapping.

Walt



 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Newbie ?: I've Built A Simple 1/4 Wave Dipole for 2 Mtrs. Could IMake a1/2 Wave? WolfMan Antenna 9 October 10th 04 04:47 PM
Newbie ?: I've Built A Simple 1/4 Wave Dipole for 2 Mtrs. Could IMake a1/2 Wave? WolfMan Homebrew 4 September 29th 04 02:40 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:28 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017