Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 06 Apr 2007 03:27:04 GMT, "Jerry Martes"
wrote: snip Belden, Alpha and Carol are all good. As important as the cable are the connectors. The compression type are the way to go, IMO. Invest in a good QS stripper and a compression tool. Don't bother with crimp tools and don't even think about twist-on. HTH, Paul Hi Paul What is the problem with "twist-ons"? I dont question your judgement, but I have found them to be good for my 2 meter application. Now I am considering doing some work at 2 GHz. This is a good time for me to learn about cable and F connectors. Thanks Jerry Two reasons I don't like twist-ons. First, I don't find them to make that great of a mechanical connection and can therefore be pulled off the cable fairly easily. Second, and I admit I don't have network analyzer plots to back this up or anything, I've always found them to make a mess of the shields when you twist them. That could lead to more of an impedance bump at the connector than with other types. Probably not an issue at 2 meters, but more important as the frequency goes up. Paul |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Paul Franklin
writes On Fri, 06 Apr 2007 03:27:04 GMT, "Jerry Martes" wrote: snip Belden, Alpha and Carol are all good. As important as the cable are the connectors. The compression type are the way to go, IMO. Invest in a good QS stripper and a compression tool. Don't bother with crimp tools and don't even think about twist-on. HTH, Paul Hi Paul What is the problem with "twist-ons"? I dont question your judgement, but I have found them to be good for my 2 meter application. Now I am considering doing some work at 2 GHz. This is a good time for me to learn about cable and F connectors. Thanks Jerry Two reasons I don't like twist-ons. First, I don't find them to make that great of a mechanical connection and can therefore be pulled off the cable fairly easily. If you can pull them off, you are probably not putting them on correctly. (Tip: Ignore instructions, and use cunning.) Second, and I admit I don't have network analyzer plots to back this up or anything, I've always found them to make a mess of the shields when you twist them. That could lead to more of an impedance bump at the connector than with other types. Probably not an issue at 2 meters, but more important as the frequency goes up. While the connector thread will crush the outer somewhat (causing a very short piece of low Zo), it's unlikely to be a problem in most applications, even at 2GHz. Ian. -- |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Paul Franklin wrote: On Fri, 06 Apr 2007 03:27:04 GMT, "Jerry Martes" wrote: snip Belden, Alpha and Carol are all good. As important as the cable are the connectors. The compression type are the way to go, IMO. Invest in a good QS stripper and a compression tool. Don't bother with crimp tools and don't even think about twist-on. What's the diff between a compression tool and a crimp tool? OT: I inherited break/fix responsibility (billable by the hour) on a business thinwire lan that was installed by a TV cable guy. He used twist-ons and no crimp rings. That site paid my rent for a couple years, until I eventually replaced all the connectors with proper ends. For that reason, I've always looked fondly on twist-ons, in a bizzare way. -- a d y k e s @ p a n i x . c o m Don't blame me. I voted for Gore. A Proud signature since 2001 |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Paul Franklin wrote: On 6 Apr 2007 08:29:32 -0400, (Al Dykes) wrote: In article , Paul Franklin wrote: On Fri, 06 Apr 2007 03:27:04 GMT, "Jerry Martes" wrote: snip Belden, Alpha and Carol are all good. As important as the cable are the connectors. The compression type are the way to go, IMO. Invest in a good QS stripper and a compression tool. Don't bother with crimp tools and don't even think about twist-on. What's the diff between a compression tool and a crimp tool? OT: I inherited break/fix responsibility (billable by the hour) on a business thinwire lan that was installed by a TV cable guy. He used twist-ons and no crimp rings. That site paid my rent for a couple years, until I eventually replaced all the connectors with proper ends. For that reason, I've always looked fondly on twist-ons, in a bizzare way. The compression fitting have a captive sleeve on the cable end of the fitting. You strip the cable more or less as usual, slide it up through the connector as you would with a crimp type. But then the compression tool presses the sleeve up into the body of the connector. The inside is tapered, so when the sleeve is pressed in, it compresses against the cable, locking it tightly into place. Here's a pictu http://www.cablestogo.com/product.as...=411&sku=41077 They are also available with seals for water resistant outdoor use. (In fact, the picture is of a connector with seals.) Here's what the tool looks like: http://www.cablestogo.com/product.as...1403&sku=38011 Try 'em, you'll like 'em! Paul OK. It's a large, well engineered crimp tool and fitting. I actually have tools, some cable, and a bag of ends that fit that description. I just considered them standard tools and parts for serious work. They came to me by accident. I was the "customer" for a a pre-ethernet LAN built on CATV plant that spanned a 40 floor building. -- a d y k e s @ p a n i x . c o m Don't blame me. I voted for Gore. A Proud signature since 2001 |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
help with rotor brands | Antenna | |||
which brands more likely to have linux software available? | Scanner | |||
FA:SIX(6) VARIOUS BRANDS 6883/8032/8552 RF TUBES>@big$10 | Equipment | |||
FA:SIX(6) VARIOUS BRANDS 6883/8032/8552 RF TUBES>@big$10 | Swap | |||
FA:SIX(6) VARIOUS BRANDS 6883/8032/8552 RF TUBES>@big$10 | Swap |