Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Roy Lewallen
writes Ed Nielsen wrote: At a trade show several years ago, a vendor demonstrated the effects stapling cables could have on signal transmission. He took a VCR, a ch. 3 modulator and a piece of drop cable and attached the cable to a piece of wood utilizing a regular staple gun that you buy at any home improvement store. Used the gun as most people would, and inspection of the cable showed it to be fine (undamaged). By the seventeenth staple, ch. 3 was completely gone.. It doesn't take major crushing to create mismatch, and as to whether it is significant sort of depends on what happens to be trying to get through at the particular point where the mismatch occurs. A periodically repeating mismatch, such as the one produced by the staple demonstration, can cause extreme effects as the demonstration showed. This is a very much worse case than a single mismatch. Roy Lewallen, W7EL Stapling - or any other small mismatch repeated at regular intervals - can indeed produce a severe structural mismatch (with the associated suckout) at frequencies where the intervals are one wavelength, and multiples thereof. However, the presence of a one-off connector where the match is distinctly questionable will usually go completely un-noticed (except to the most discerning of engineers). I still maintain that any problem will be because there is no proper continuity through the connector, or possibly an inner-to-outer short (maybe partial). I must admit, I haven't used an RF TDR in earnest for over 20 years. I have found that, if it buzzes out OK at DC, it will generally be OK at RF. Ian. -- |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
With all due respect, that's a rather frightening position to maintain.
I've had to replace both .750 and .500 because of dings. Complaints were that certain channels were out. A couple of years ago I had to replace a 4 foot piece of RG 6 inside a wall (splitter to outlet) that had the attenuation of a 100 foot cable. 950MHz to 1450MHz worked (though not near as well as it should have), but the rest of the bandwidth up to 2200MHz didn't work at all. Electricians had greatly exceeded the minimum bend radius when they made up the outlet. DC does not necessarily mean that RF will work, nor does RF necessarily mean that DC will work. -- CIAO! Ed N. "Ian Jackson" wrote in message ... years. I have found that, if it buzzes out OK at DC, it will generally be OK at RF. Ian. -- |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Ed Nielsen
writes "Ian Jackson" wrote in message ... years. I have found that, if it buzzes out OK at DC, it will generally be OK at RF. Ian. With all due respect, that's a rather frightening position to maintain. I've had to replace both .750 and .500 because of dings. Complaints were that certain channels were out. A couple of years ago I had to replace a 4 foot piece of RG 6 inside a wall (splitter to outlet) that had the attenuation of a 100 foot cable. 950MHz to 1450MHz worked (though not near as well as it should have), but the rest of the bandwidth up to 2200MHz didn't work at all. Electricians had greatly exceeded the minimum bend radius when they made up the outlet. DC does not necessarily mean that RF will work, nor does RF necessarily mean that DC will work. Ed, I'm sure what you say is true. However, one-off moderate mismatches (or even repeated moderate mismatches which are buffered by attenuation), such as might be caused by the use of poor quality connectors, should not cause a failure of service unless the service would have been marginal if the connectors were good. As for bends in cable, if you can, tie a loose knot in a piece of coax, run a wideband sweep through it, and observe the output. Now pull the knot tight. Let me know when the output starts to be affected. Let me say again, I'm not advocating sloppy practices and poor workmanship. Manufacturers' specs and industry standards should always be adhered to. This avoids endless truck-rolls (God - I hate that Americanism!) to the 1% of customers where some bright spark has cut one corner too many. But, especially in the amateur world, we should maybe not worry too much about using things which industry has rejected, often for reasons which have absolutely no impact on what we are trying to do. So I'm NOT throwing out my stash of crimp and screw-on F-connectors! Ian. -- |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Let's just agree to disagree. We both hold positions based, at least in
part, on many years of experiences. I did not say that hex-crimp fittings WILL cause issues, I said they COULD cause issues. As for the knot/sweep thing; no need. I have already seen the results. -- CIAO! Ed N. "Ian Jackson" wrote in message ... In message , Ed Nielsen writes "Ian Jackson" wrote in message ... years. I have found that, if it buzzes out OK at DC, it will generally be OK at RF. Ian. With all due respect, that's a rather frightening position to maintain. I've had to replace both .750 and .500 because of dings. Complaints were that certain channels were out. A couple of years ago I had to replace a 4 foot piece of RG 6 inside a wall (splitter to outlet) that had the attenuation of a 100 foot cable. 950MHz to 1450MHz worked (though not near as well as it should have), but the rest of the bandwidth up to 2200MHz didn't work at all. Electricians had greatly exceeded the minimum bend radius when they made up the outlet. DC does not necessarily mean that RF will work, nor does RF necessarily mean that DC will work. Ed, I'm sure what you say is true. However, one-off moderate mismatches (or even repeated moderate mismatches which are buffered by attenuation), such as might be caused by the use of poor quality connectors, should not cause a failure of service unless the service would have been marginal if the connectors were good. As for bends in cable, if you can, tie a loose knot in a piece of coax, run a wideband sweep through it, and observe the output. Now pull the knot tight. Let me know when the output starts to be affected. Let me say again, I'm not advocating sloppy practices and poor workmanship. Manufacturers' specs and industry standards should always be adhered to. This avoids endless truck-rolls (God - I hate that Americanism!) to the 1% of customers where some bright spark has cut one corner too many. But, especially in the amateur world, we should maybe not worry too much about using things which industry has rejected, often for reasons which have absolutely no impact on what we are trying to do. So I'm NOT throwing out my stash of crimp and screw-on F-connectors! Ian. -- |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
help with rotor brands | Antenna | |||
which brands more likely to have linux software available? | Scanner | |||
FA:SIX(6) VARIOUS BRANDS 6883/8032/8552 RF TUBES>@big$10 | Equipment | |||
FA:SIX(6) VARIOUS BRANDS 6883/8032/8552 RF TUBES>@big$10 | Swap | |||
FA:SIX(6) VARIOUS BRANDS 6883/8032/8552 RF TUBES>@big$10 | Swap |