|
Radio Shack's FM turstile antenna [150-1639 or 15-1639]
Hi. Does Radioshack still manufacture Part No. 150-1639 or 15-1639, which
is an FM turnstile antenna? Looks unlikely to me. http://support.radioshack.com/support_video/15785.htm [Crossposted, but all replies/followups will go to alt.radio.broadcasting] |
Where can I buy this and HAM radio's in Canada???
"Richard" wrote in message ... Hi. Does Radioshack still manufacture Part No. 150-1639 or 15-1639, which is an FM turnstile antenna? Looks unlikely to me. http://support.radioshack.com/support_video/15785.htm [Crossposted, but all replies/followups will go to alt.radio.broadcasting] |
Greetings:
Radio Shack's antennas were manufactured by Winegard..... see : http://www.winegard.com/offair/prost...myagi.htm#6000 Is this what you had in mind? Rgds: Eric "Richard" wrote in message ... Hi. Does Radioshack still manufacture Part No. 150-1639 or 15-1639, which is an FM turnstile antenna? Looks unlikely to me. http://support.radioshack.com/support_video/15785.htm [Crossposted, but all replies/followups will go to alt.radio.broadcasting] |
Eric K. Weber wrote:
Greetings: Radio Shack's antennas were manufactured by Winegard..... see : http://www.winegard.com/offair/prost...myagi.htm#6000 Is this what you had in mind? Rgds: Eric Was Radioshacks offering a folded dipole arrangement? |
On 5 Feb 2004 16:28:10 GMT, "Richard"
wrote: Eric K. Weber wrote: Greetings: Radio Shack's antennas were manufactured by Winegard..... see : http://www.winegard.com/offair/prost...myagi.htm#6000 Is this what you had in mind? Rgds: Eric Was Radioshacks offering a folded dipole arrangement? Yes, it was just as shown in the Winegard site. Installed one at a friends mountain cabin and he went from no FM reception to being able to receive 3. Might not sound great, but for a cabin nestled in the hills and 75 miles from the nearest broadcaster that isn't too bad. |
"Howard" wrote in message ... On 5 Feb 2004 16:28:10 GMT, "Richard" wrote: Eric K. Weber wrote: Greetings: Radio Shack's antennas were manufactured by Winegard..... see : http://www.winegard.com/offair/prost...myagi.htm#6000 Is this what you had in mind? Rgds: Eric Was Radioshacks offering a folded dipole arrangement? Yes, it was just as shown in the Winegard site. Installed one at a friends mountain cabin and he went from no FM reception to being able to receive 3. Might not sound great, but for a cabin nestled in the hills and 75 miles from the nearest broadcaster that isn't too bad. That's not a folded dipole actually by the looks of it. It's a hertz dipole. The element on neither dipole folds into a narrow rectangular shape. ie dipole _________X__________ folded dipole ________X_________ |__________________| |
i guess it s 300ohm now instead of 50-75
"Richard" wrote in message ... "Howard" wrote in message ... On 5 Feb 2004 16:28:10 GMT, "Richard" wrote: Eric K. Weber wrote: Greetings: Radio Shack's antennas were manufactured by Winegard..... see : http://www.winegard.com/offair/prost...myagi.htm#6000 Is this what you had in mind? Rgds: Eric Was Radioshacks offering a folded dipole arrangement? Yes, it was just as shown in the Winegard site. Installed one at a friends mountain cabin and he went from no FM reception to being able to receive 3. Might not sound great, but for a cabin nestled in the hills and 75 miles from the nearest broadcaster that isn't too bad. That's not a folded dipole actually by the looks of it. It's a hertz dipole. The element on neither dipole folds into a narrow rectangular shape. ie dipole _________X__________ folded dipole ________X_________ |__________________| |
On Fri, 6 Feb 2004 15:43:51 -0000, "Richard"
wrote: "Howard" wrote in message .. . On 5 Feb 2004 16:28:10 GMT, "Richard" wrote: Eric K. Weber wrote: Greetings: Radio Shack's antennas were manufactured by Winegard..... see : http://www.winegard.com/offair/prost...myagi.htm#6000 Is this what you had in mind? Rgds: Eric Was Radioshacks offering a folded dipole arrangement? Yes, it was just as shown in the Winegard site. Installed one at a friends mountain cabin and he went from no FM reception to being able to receive 3. Might not sound great, but for a cabin nestled in the hills and 75 miles from the nearest broadcaster that isn't too bad. That's not a folded dipole actually by the looks of it. It's a hertz dipole. The element on neither dipole folds into a narrow rectangular shape. ie dipole _________X__________ folded dipole ________X_________ |__________________| In the picture it's hard to see so I changed my screen resolution and it looked like it may be folded. Having installed the RatShack model I can positively say that was a folded dipole. Being that Winegard makes the antennas RatShack sells I made a leap of faith that the picture just didn't show that detail well. In any case, for under $20 it's a good performing omni. |
"Eric K. Weber" wrote: Greetings: Radio Shack's antennas were manufactured by Winegard..... see : http://www.winegard.com/offair/prost...myagi.htm#6000 Is this what you had in mind? Since a yagi and turnstile are by definition not the same, no. http://www.winegard.com/offair/pdf/pr-6010.pdf |
My recollection of a turnstile antenna is two folded dipoles at 90 degrees
to each other. See URL: http://www.qsl.net/wb8erj/turnstile_antenna.htm A search of radio shack catalog does not show one nor is it in the manual lookup section However there is a Lindsay turnstile at URL: http://www.lindsayelec.com/fm88-108.html Easily found by using Google -- the searchers friend -- 73- Cambio - Keyboard To You (:-) |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:41 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com