Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 16:04:55 -0700, Roy Lewallen wrote:
Walt, before digging into your recent posting, I'd really like to get one issue settled. I think it would be helpful in our discussion. The issue is: Can you find even one example of any transmission line problem which cannot be solved, or a complete analysis done, without making the assumption that waves reflect from a "virtual short" or "virtual open"? That is, any example where such an assumption is necessary in order to find the currents, voltages, and impedances, and the magnitude and phase of forward and reverse voltage and current waves? Roy Lewallen, W7EL No Roy, of course not. I am not attempting to assert that reflection coefficients should be used in such an analysis. I'm only asserting that it's another way of performing an analysis, one that I believe paints a more visible picture of the how the pertinent waves behave in the circuit. If I still haven't persuaded you that it's a viable way of analyzing the impedance matching function then I'll back off and not pursue the issue any further. Incidentally, you didn't answer my questions. Walt |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Stub Matching software ? | Antenna | |||
Analyzing Woger | General | |||
Analyzing Woger | Policy | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to | Antenna |