Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Kelley wrote:
It certainly is an interesting way of looking at things, Cecil. It's certainly true that equal and opposite fields cancel. When that's the case though it becomes problematic arguing that there are waves there. The waves are certainly there and are measured in the process of determining the values of the s-parameters. That's enough proof of their existence for me. If you deny their existence, you are denying that the s-parameter measurement procedure is valid. Jim, what happens to the ExB power density in the equal and opposite fields that cancel? -- 73, Cecil, w5dxp.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Stub Matching software ? | Antenna | |||
Analyzing Woger | General | |||
Analyzing Woger | Policy | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to | Antenna |