| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Apr 19, 3:44 pm, Cecil Moore wrote:
Dr. Honeydew wrote: Ah, I can see you didn't take me seriously. But I was dead serious. It is absolutely not necessary for the source to be dissipating the reverse wave it sucks up as heat. Can a wave exist without energy? Where does the energy in the sucked up wave go since it doesn't go into the source. You are getting close to the truth. Yes, the forward and reverse travelling waves are not necessarily moving energy. The Bird wattmeter, despite its name, is computing a number with the dimension of watts, but which does not necessarily represent energy flowing (it represents flowing energy when the indicated value is 0 in one direction or the other). This will probably (I understate) be hard to accept but is the only reasonable conclusion after examining a large number of experiments and trying to rationalize the answer to "Where does the energy in the reflected wave go?" Once it becomes clear that there is no good answer to that question, the only possible conclusion is that the question is invalid and the roots of its invalidity lie in the assumption of energy in the reflected wave. ....Keith |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Stub Matching software ? | Antenna | |||
| Analyzing Woger | General | |||
| Analyzing Woger | Policy | |||
| A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
| A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to | Antenna | |||