Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote:
Fields cannot cancel unless those fields first exist. Please clarify for us the distinction between canceled fields, and fields which don't exist. There is no energy traveling in the direction of fields that cancel; E1xB1 and E2xB2 in this example. Assume E1xB1 joules/sec associated with the first field and E2xB2 joules/sec associated with the second field. The fields cancel. What happens to the E1xB1 joules/sec and the E2xB2 joules/sec? Since the fields cancel, and energy does not travel in the company of nonexistent fields, there is no energy here with which to concern ourselves. Hint: Their energy components are redistributed in a direction that allows constructive interference. In a transmission line, there is only one other direction available. Producing a result which can only occur when there is no energy traveling in the direction of E1xB1 and E2xB2. 73, Jim AC6XG |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Stub Matching software ? | Antenna | |||
Analyzing Woger | General | |||
Analyzing Woger | Policy | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to | Antenna |