Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Keith Dysart wrote:
I suggest that the solution to this ambiguity is to do the same analysis for the current, which should be found to be 90 degrees shifted from the voltage. The real current is either leading or lagging the voltage. Rotate the frame of reference in the direction that will cause a lagging current to appear counter-clockwise from the voltage and a leading current to appear clockwise from the voltage. This just illustrates how artificial standing waves are. For 1/4WL the standing-wave current leads the standing- wave voltage by 90 degrees then suddenly undergoes a step function to lag the standing-wave voltage by 90 degrees for the next 1/4WL. In any case, the point is whether standing-wave current can be used to measure the phase shift through a loading coil. EZNEC indicates that it cannot. Kraus indicates that it cannot. Yet the people who did exactly that continue to report the results as valid. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Stub Matching software ? | Antenna | |||
Analyzing Woger | General | |||
Analyzing Woger | Policy | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to | Antenna |