Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 03:34:29 GMT, Owen Duffy wrote:
Danny Richardson wrote in : ... Works okay for me. Nice paper ( I stole the NEC deck). Hi Danny, You will see that the FR card has a symbolic variable for the frequency, you will need to feed it a float value. (I used a PERL script to run a series of models by tailoring the basic NEC deck, executing it, and summarising the results.) [snip] Owen No problem Owen, I'll use MultiNec which very easily allows me to run "test cases" using variables with no programming required on my part. G. Danny |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Danny Richardson wrote in
: .... No problem Owen, I'll use MultiNec which very easily allows me to run "test cases" using variables with no programming required on my part. Ok. There are other tools that allow symbolic variables, and of course NEC allows specification of a range of frequencies on the FR card. The main reason for using PERL to build, run and sumamrise is the summarise stage. At that point I merge the NEC output with real transmission line models, L-tuner models etc... and without wading through 5MB of NEC output by hand. The system view is a bigger picture than the NEC output. Owen |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Need AM antenna advice | Antenna | |||
Need Antenna Advice | Antenna | |||
Antenna Advice | Shortwave | |||
ISO Advice on new antenna | CB | |||
2m homebrew antenna advice??? | Boatanchors |