Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Danny Richardson wrote in
: .... No problem Owen, I'll use MultiNec which very easily allows me to run "test cases" using variables with no programming required on my part. Ok. There are other tools that allow symbolic variables, and of course NEC allows specification of a range of frequencies on the FR card. The main reason for using PERL to build, run and sumamrise is the summarise stage. At that point I merge the NEC output with real transmission line models, L-tuner models etc... and without wading through 5MB of NEC output by hand. The system view is a bigger picture than the NEC output. Owen |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Need AM antenna advice | Antenna | |||
Need Antenna Advice | Antenna | |||
Antenna Advice | Shortwave | |||
ISO Advice on new antenna | CB | |||
2m homebrew antenna advice??? | Boatanchors |