On 3 May, 10:41, wrote:
On May 2, 12:06 pm, art wrote:

On 2 May, 04:13, (J. B. Wood) wrote:

Then how do you account for the broad rejection from
"EE"s of Gaussian antennas that comply and are
supported by electromagnetic theory as embodied
in Maxwells equations ?

It's fairly simple from my point of view.. You talk a bunch of jibber-
jabber
that really doesn't make a whole lot of sense, and you seem to refuse
to want to build and test an actual antenna.
Talk is cheap to me. I want to see one in the air, live, and working.
Compare it to a known reference like a 1/2 dipole and let the chips
fall where they may. Then you have something to actually talk about.
MK

I was referring to 'EE's not " HS "graduates ! It is certainly
understandable
from those who are not familiar with the arts. You can only get so
far with a
general understanding but it has been said on this newsgroup by others
that without a full understanding of the concepts you finish up with
lots of
misconceptions, and that seems to make makes sense when I read your
postings.
.. I suggest you keep quiet and wait until you can buy one then you
are
less likely to screw up. It is not a design for a typical couch expert
to
expound upon. Suggest you wait until you can quote from a book
if you want to impress