Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 06 Feb 2004 06:12:43 -0600, Cecil Moore
wrote: Now please tell us why lumped inductive reactances don't agree with wire segment coils, stubs, or reality. Operator error. It's like trying to measure Ohms without turning on the meter's current source. There's a lot of institutionalized ignorance in these threads. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Clark wrote:
wrote: Now please tell us why lumped inductive reactances don't agree with wire segment coils, stubs, or reality. Operator error. Yep, the error is in the operator's choice of a model that doesn't match reality. -- 73, Cecil, W5DXP |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 06 Feb 2004 13:32:40 -0600, Cecil Moore
wrote: Yep, the error is in the operator's choice of a model that doesn't match reality. Institutionalized here for the sake of argument. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
Are fractal antennas being used in cellphones? | Antenna |