Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
snip
That's interesting. Thanks for the tips. At the moment, being new to HF, I have only a rudimentary antenna consisting of a copper pipe dipole (built for 10m) laying near the peak of my garage roof. Unmodified, it did 10 and did 15 with a tuner. Then, I made one element longer with an alligator-clip lead and about 12 feet of TV-coaxial cable; the garage isn't very long, so it makes an L-shape in the roof. Call it an "L" antenna if you wish; I call it an unholy mess, but it gets me on 20 and 40 with the tuner. I have worked New Zealand, Australia, Estonia and the Ukraine as well as any number of places in North America. The other hams, who spent their money on good antennas, made many of my QSO's possible and I thank them. Speaking of valves, I have hundreds of them. I am restoring an old military tester and I'll have the valves available in a few months. What everyone seems to forget is that modern receivers tend to have signal gains of 120dB or more when operated with everything turned up full. With this sort of sensitivity, you only need a couple of watts of radiated signal to work around the world, given the right band conditions. With a kilowatt or so and a high gain antenna, it is possible to work just about anywhere first go. It all rather takes the fun out of operating when it is that easy. Interesting you mention using copper pipe for a dipole. Some of my more successful antennas have been made from aluminium tube. I found they give a lovely broad bandwidth, generally the fatter the tube, the wider the bandwidth. As you say, there are plenty of hams who have spent money on high gain antennas. Lets give them some signals that allow them to put their expensive antennas to good use:-) Having worked passing commercial traffic with high powered equipment, I find I get much more satisfaction from completing QSO's using QRP equipment and basic antennas than using the big expensive stuff. If you do decide to play around with valve final stages, you should find that they are much easier to tune into virtually any old bit of wire. Just be careful to monitor the grid current and keep the anode voltages down when the system is not at resonance. One of my favourite valve matching circuits was essentially a CLC design with the variable inductance formed as a goniometer - essentially two concentric tubes with wire coils wound around them. As the inside tube was rotated, the inductance coupling to the fixed outer tube varied. This sytem was quite robust and I never had any arcing problems with the inductors. The capacitors used to flash over in the high humidity of the tropics on full power sometimes, but reducing power by 25% usually solved the problem. A modern version could be produced with some plastic drain pipe and a bit of coiled springy phospor bronze or copper strip to make the connections to the rotating coil. That way you get continuously variable capacitance and inductance without any switches or the intermittant contact problems that modern wound inductors with a contact wheel suffer from. All the best with your experiments Mike G0ULI |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS: SGC Automatic Antenna Tuner | Swap | |||
FA: ICOM AT-160 HF AUTOMATIC ANTENNA TUNER IC-706, 729 728 | Swap | |||
How do I design an automatic antenna tuner? | Homebrew | |||
BEST automatic antenna tuner = ?? | Antenna | |||
FA: LDG RT-11 Automatic Antenna Tuner | Swap |