Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 06 Feb 2004 12:05:09 -0500, Stef
wrote: If someone would put current meters on each side of the trap, what would he measure ? A reduction of the current ? On a Bugcatcher coil, isn't this is what is happening? The coil is usually tuned after the antenna is installed ? The Bugcatcher coil is acting ilke a trap ? Hi Stef, Your confusion arises from trying to learn via the internet where ALL answers are available (especially here). To avoid confusion, you need to establish a reference point, something you can trust. With modelers, you can start simple and progress to issues of more complexity. This instruction is inductive, which means (employing our EE term instead of the common English usage of the term) it can boost your understanding, or it can impede it. Thus it pays to find a good traditional source to enlarge the deductive side of understanding (usually a good book or correspondence/conversation). Philosophy aside, coils as parts of a radiating structure come in two flavors - you have already noted and described them above (if incompletely): traps and loads (which may also be traps). The controversy over coils that is currently raging (all puns intended) focus on the coil acting as a replacement length to a short antenna. These loads are not traps. Such loads, or loading coils, attempt to create a higher flow of current through them to achieve resonance. Traps imply through language an element that stops. Traps are parallel resonant elements that are high-Z in series to the adjacent sections of the antenna. They trap (stall, stop, impede) currents from proceeding through them to the other section on the farther side. Hence they are used with antennas that are larger than necessary. This makes them frequency selective, open switches that disconnect excess length from the resonant shorter sections. So there you have the duality of short-antenna/load and long-antenna/trap. Then we progress to where the trap may become a load (in the sense of lengthening a too short antenna). In this function, the coil/cap combination is no longer resonant alone, but within the parasitics of the larger structure (which also exhibits capacitance) it becomes resonant. In this sense, the trap becomes part of a series resonance and is no longer impeding flow. Hence there is another duality to consider: series-resonance/short and parallel-resonance/long. The use of an element (coil/capacitor) as trap (parallel resonant) AND load (series resonant) gives you opportunistic designs that allow one tuned element (still speaking of the coil/capacitor) to offer more than two band operation. Traditionally, the trap splits the radiating structure into two band operation; additionally, the sections that are thus physically split may also resonate (with the now incorrectly named trap) in series in a third band. This opportunistic arrangement may also reveal dual band operation of quarterwave sections driving halfwave sections (or other combinations) for single band, gain antennas. When you get into this kind of sophistication, it often turns on juggling many variables to achieve this legerdemain. You can either approach it cookbook style or through a modeler. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Antenna Loading Coils | Antenna | |||
Loading Coils & Numbers | Antenna | |||
Loading Coils in 20th ARRL Antenna Book | Antenna | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy | Antenna | |||
Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna |