Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Without a balun, your feedline could become part of the antenna. If
noise is being radiated by such things as house wiring, the feedline part of the antenna is likely to pick up more noise because it goes near and into the house. A current balun prevents the feedline from becoming part of the antenna and so it can reduce the noise. A lot of local noise is predominantly vertically polarized. So if you have a horizontal antenna without a balun, the feedline, which often is vertical, can pick up a lot more noise than the antenna. Again, a balun prevents feedline pickup and can make things quieter. If you're feeding the antenna with coaxial cable, put the balun at the feedpoint. If feeding with twinlead, put it where the feedline connects to the tuner or receiver. To learn more about baluns, see http://eznec.com/Amateur/Articles/Baluns.htm. Roy Lewallen, W7EL Bill Ogden wrote: A discussion on the towers reflector mentioned, in passing, that a current balun helped lower received noise. The discussion was about something else and this aspect was not explored. Is this common? I had never heard of it before, but I many holes in my understanding of antennas. Under what circumstances would this apply? Where would the balun (toroids) be placed? Feed point or at bottom of tower? (My particular interest is for use with a half sloper and for 160/80/40 meters.) Bill W2WO |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
4:1 Current Balun Common Mode Impedance? | Antenna | |||
Voltage vs. Current Balun - OCF Dipole | Antenna | |||
MFJ Tuner "Current Balun" conversion. | Antenna | |||
A Single-Core 4:1 Current Balun | Antenna | |||
Horizontal loop - balun or no balun ? | Antenna |