Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Richard Harrison" wrote in message ... Myron, W0PBV wrote: "Is that low efficiency of 30-50% really true?" No. The pi network would not be so popular were that true. The efficiency of a Class B or Class C amplifier is higher than that and the network by itself is very low loss. RF amplifiers typically have efficiencies well above 50% because much of their source resistance is of the lossless variety. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI If the efficiency or loses were in 50% range, we would be "ungluing" the components in the PI network at the 2 kW power levels. Can you picture 1 kW being "lost" in the coil and capacitors? Typical matching network or tuners in the transceivers have loss about 10% when power output is measured with tuner in or out while maintaining same input. Amps with decent copper and quality caps should be less than 10% in loses. Yuri, K3BU |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
New Program. L-match Networks. | Boatanchors | |||
New Program. L-match Networks. | Equipment | |||
13cm networks | Digital | |||
13cm networks | Digital | |||
Really Inefficient Antennas | Antenna |