Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Wes Stewart" wrote in message
... On 24 May 2007 14:46:38 -0700, K7ITM wrote: (snip) A number of years ago in this group our departed friend, Reg, made a comment more or less saying that the fewer (non-ideal) reactances were in the matching network, the lower the losses were. I offered an example that proved this wrong. I'm extremely strapped for time but I think the thread has something to do with L-networks if anyone cares to search for it. Wes http://tinyurl.com/2vn4sa |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
New Program. L-match Networks. | Boatanchors | |||
New Program. L-match Networks. | Equipment | |||
13cm networks | Digital | |||
13cm networks | Digital | |||
Really Inefficient Antennas | Antenna |