| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Wes Stewart" wrote in message
... On 24 May 2007 14:46:38 -0700, K7ITM wrote: (snip) A number of years ago in this group our departed friend, Reg, made a comment more or less saying that the fewer (non-ideal) reactances were in the matching network, the lower the losses were. I offered an example that proved this wrong. I'm extremely strapped for time but I think the thread has something to do with L-networks if anyone cares to search for it. Wes http://tinyurl.com/2vn4sa |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| New Program. L-match Networks. | Boatanchors | |||
| New Program. L-match Networks. | Equipment | |||
| 13cm networks | Digital | |||
| 13cm networks | Digital | |||
| Really Inefficient Antennas | Antenna | |||