Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Richard Clark" wrote in message ... On Wed, 23 May 2007 23:33:45 -0400, "Jimmie D" wrote: Giving W8QUR the benifit of the doubt is like saying a 4 cylinder Hummer's efficiency would be improved if you removed the chassis. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC You either have to give the benifit of the doubt to W8QUR or the origonal poster W8QUR had benifit of editors that reviewed his work and decided it was correct. Saying that a Pi-net is as inefficent as the OP interpretted W8QUR as saying is a huge blunder that I doubt anyone who has the credentials to author a magazine article would make. The OP only assumed he was talking about Pi-networks and admitted W8QUR did not directly refer to the network as this even though in 1965 it was still called a Pi-net. It is also uncommon to call a pi-net a "system". While you cant be sure unless you have the origonal article in its entirity I will put my money on W8QUR in this case. Jimmie |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
New Program. L-match Networks. | Boatanchors | |||
New Program. L-match Networks. | Equipment | |||
13cm networks | Digital | |||
13cm networks | Digital | |||
Really Inefficient Antennas | Antenna |