Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is that "low efficiency" of 30-50% really true?
Does that author bother to explain WHY he thinks that to be true? No. That's why I was surprised enough to ask the newsgroup. Given that pi-coupled class-C vacuum tube output stages commonly run 75% and higher efficiency, he's immediately proven wrong by example. Good point! I'm assuming that you haven't left out some important context from the quotation... It was only a half-page article in a small-format magazine in the first place, and I did not leave out anything significant! It would be interesting to hear why W8QUR thought to write that statement about efficiency. It would also be interesting to know if his article elicited letters-to-the-editor wondering about that, back then. We'll probably never know. That was 40+ years ago, and W8QUR isn't in the online callbook, so it will be hard to ask him. At one time I read the following issues and don't remember any comments or corrections, but that was a long time ago! -- --Myron A. Calhoun, W0PBV. Five boxes preserve our freedoms: soap, ballot, witness, jury, and cartridge NRA Life Member & Certified Instructor for Rifle, Pistol, & Home Firearm Safety Also Certified Instructor for the Kansas Concealed-Carry Handgun (CCH) license |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Are pi networks THAT INefficient? | Antenna | |||
New Program. L-match Networks. | Equipment | |||
13cm networks | Digital | |||
13cm networks | Digital | |||
Really Inefficient Antennas | Antenna |