Water burns!
 

On Jun 19, 4:58 pm, Jim Higgins wrote:
You have NOT posted the link I asked for.

Since I have quoted the posting three times now, I guess I am not
understanding what you mean by "link". It is pretty easy to understand
assuming the rules of classical logic. A logical assertion (theory) is
either true or false. If any part of it is false, the entire assertion
is false and is therefore logically rejected as false (discarded).
--
73, Cecil, w5dxp.com

Water burns!
 

Jim Kelley wrote:
Since you can't provide an instance in which I disagreed with an IEEE
definition, perhaps you'll be a gentleman and retract your comments.

I will provide that quote from you when I have
time to perform the Google search.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com

Water burns!
 

On Jun 21, 5:45 am, Cecil Moore wrote:
Jim Kelley wrote:
Since you can't provide an instance in which I disagreed with an IEEE
definition, perhaps you'll be a gentleman and retract your comments.

I will provide that quote from you when I have
time to perform the Google search.

Sure you will. :-)

Concentrate your search on the original discussion where you were
claiming that an IEEE definition proves that power flows through
transmission lines. (I think you referred to that one again just
recently.)

73, ac6xg

Water burns!
 

Jim Kelley wrote:
On Jun 21, 5:45 am, Cecil Moore wrote:
I will provide that quote from you when I have
time to perform the Google search.

Sure you will. :-)

The only computer to which I have present access blocks
Google Group access so bear with me on that one. Or you
could simply prove it to yourself. It would be during
the time when you were asserting, "No work = no power",
while the IEEE Dictionary requires no such limitations
on the definition of "power".
--
73, Cecil, w5dxp.com

Water burns!
 

Cecil Moore wrote:

The only computer to which I have present access blocks
Google Group access so bear with me on that one.

You know what they say about excuses, Cecil. :-)

Will you never tire of calling people liars?

73, ac6xg

Water burns!
 

Jim Kelley wrote:
Will you never tire of calling people liars?

Pot: Kettle, Kettle: Pot. A few postings ago, you used 23
words to call me a liar - not a very efficient use of words.
--
73, Cecil, w5dxp.com

Water burns!
 

Cecil Moore wrote:

Jim Kelley wrote:

Will you never tire of calling people liars?


Pot: Kettle, Kettle: Pot.

The frequency of repetition begins to suggest a big lie.

A few postings ago, you used 23
words to call me a liar - not a very efficient use of words.

You are able to count the words, yet you neglect once again to include
them as a reference. Apparently that wouldn't have suited your
purpose. It never does.

I'm certain that my comments were along the lines of a correction to
one of your frequent mis-statements regarding something that I "said".
I suggest that, rather than reading so much between the lines,
supplementing and substituting your own words and ideas, you should
give more regard to the explicit meaning conveyed by the words
provided by the author.

ac6xg

Water burns!
 

Jim Kelley wrote:
Concentrate your search on the original discussion where you were
claiming that an IEEE definition proves that power flows through
transmission lines. (I think you referred to that one again just
recently.)

Please follow your own advice and quote what I actually
said instead of making it up as you go along. As I remember,
here was my response - a quote from my years-old magazine
article:

"The term "power flow" has been avoided in favor of "energy
flow". Power is a measure of that energy flow per unit time
through a plane."
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com

Water burns!
 

Jim Kelley wrote:
I suggest that, rather than reading so much between the lines,
supplementing and substituting your own words and ideas, you should give
more regard to the explicit meaning conveyed by the words provided by
the author.

So your advice to me is: "Do as I say, not as I do"?
How many times have you told me what I posted without
ever bothering to quote what I actually wrote? Stones
and glass houses come to mind.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com

Water burns!
 

Jim Kelley wrote:
Concentrate your search on the original discussion where you were
claiming that an IEEE definition proves that power flows through
transmission lines. (I think you referred to that one again just
recently.)

I remember that one, Jim. It was when you and I sided
together against the IEEE Dictionary. The IEEE Dictionary
says that power propagates. You and I agreed that power
doesn't propagate.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com