| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
June 12th 07, 12:05 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
|
|||
|
|||
Water burns!
Cecil Moore wrote:
wrote: Since the discussion was always about science and not about TV cop dramas, it would be obvious to just about everyone which definition was meant, but you know that and are just playing word games again. Why is it OK to beat me about the head and shoulders for accidentally omitting an adjective and not OK to point out your omission of same? I doubt that you've ever accidentally omitted an adjective in your life. All your posts are rather cleverly crafted to produce maximum consternation, I will give you that. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
|
#3
June 12th 07, 01:55 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
|
|||
|
|||
|
Water burns!
Cecil Moore wrote:
wrote: I doubt that you've ever accidentally omitted an adjective in your life. Of course, I don't consider myself to be omniscient. The difference between you and me is that you put your faith in science while I am skeptical of virtually everything. IMO, Newton's laws of physics were proved wrong and their application had to be limited as a result. If Newton had been informed about seconds getting longer and mass increasing as velocity is increased, he no doubt would have rejected such as complete nonsense. Is a ruler calibrated to 1/32 of an inch wrong compared to a micrometer calibrated to .0005 inch? Is the micrometer wrong compared to an optical inferometer? Must one use an optical inferometer to build a one hole outhouse? Again, how do you explain the fact that entangled particles violate the theory that nothing can happen faster than the speed of light? Oh yeah, I forgot - simply re-define the problem out of existence. Those particles are communicating faster than light but there is no information flow (yet). A nonsense question. There is a big difference between "something happening" and mass moving, but you know that, don't you? -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| FA: "RADIO, A STUDY OF FIRST PRINCIPLES" 1928 E.E.BURNS-NR | Equipment | |||
| FA: "RADIO, A STUDY OF FIRST PRINCIPLES" 1928 E.E.BURNS-NR | Equipment | |||
| FA: "RADIO, A STUDY OF FIRST PRINCIPLES" 1928 E.E.BURNS-NR | Equipment | |||
| FA: "RADIO, A STUDY OF FIRST PRINCIPLES" 1928 E.E.BURNS-NR | Equipment | |||
| WA3MOJ crahses and Burns!!! | CB | |||
Hybrid Mode
