Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote:
wrote: Since the discussion was always about science and not about TV cop dramas, it would be obvious to just about everyone which definition was meant, but you know that and are just playing word games again. Why is it OK to beat me about the head and shoulders for accidentally omitting an adjective and not OK to point out your omission of same? I doubt that you've ever accidentally omitted an adjective in your life. All your posts are rather cleverly crafted to produce maximum consternation, I will give you that. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA: "RADIO, A STUDY OF FIRST PRINCIPLES" 1928 E.E.BURNS-NR | Equipment | |||
FA: "RADIO, A STUDY OF FIRST PRINCIPLES" 1928 E.E.BURNS-NR | Equipment | |||
FA: "RADIO, A STUDY OF FIRST PRINCIPLES" 1928 E.E.BURNS-NR | Equipment | |||
FA: "RADIO, A STUDY OF FIRST PRINCIPLES" 1928 E.E.BURNS-NR | Equipment | |||
WA3MOJ crahses and Burns!!! | CB |