| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ian White GM3SEK wrote:
I'm sure those straw men of yours are shaking in their boots. I think if you will check the history of this thread, someone asserted that scientific theories are very rarely ever wrong but sometimes have to be boundary condition limited to become subsets of more accurate theories. So I am never wrong - I am just in the process of defining the boundary conditions for my scientific theories. :-) -- 73, Cecil, w5dxp.com |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| FA: "RADIO, A STUDY OF FIRST PRINCIPLES" 1928 E.E.BURNS-NR | Equipment | |||
| FA: "RADIO, A STUDY OF FIRST PRINCIPLES" 1928 E.E.BURNS-NR | Equipment | |||
| FA: "RADIO, A STUDY OF FIRST PRINCIPLES" 1928 E.E.BURNS-NR | Equipment | |||
| FA: "RADIO, A STUDY OF FIRST PRINCIPLES" 1928 E.E.BURNS-NR | Equipment | |||
| WA3MOJ crahses and Burns!!! | CB | |||