Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
snip
I did appreciate your comments and thank you for supplying them but caution is advised, this is America! You are either with us or against us. Cheers Art Art, I don't stand in judgement, I just say it as I see it. I don't like to see an idea dismissed and ridiculed out of hand without a fair hearing. Ham radio is a hobby that is supposed to be about experimentation and self teaching, as much as contesting or chatting on the air. You cannot learn without making mistakes and when errors are discovered, a courteous explanation of the problem is somewhat better than descent into personal diatribe. I do not consider myself to be an authority on antennas but I have spent years at college being taught the classical theory of how it all works. I am prepared to accept that from time to time that theory needs to be updated or adjusted in the light of new discoveries. I do not accept that any recent antenna developments are likely to require a new form of physics in order to explain their mode of operation. It is just that we haven't understood how to apply existing theory in the correct way yet. My position is essentially that of a neutral observer who intervened only in order to restore some much needed balance to the debate. Regards Mike G0ULI |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Announcing SwezeyDsp Upgrade! Use your PC to filter SWL audio in real time | Shortwave | |||
Here's the real time Gray Line (sorry) | Shortwave | |||
Real Time Gray Line Map | Shortwave | |||
Proof of Stevie Double Standard, if proof were really needed | Policy | |||
Almost real-time photos of Mt. St. Helen (volcano) | Shortwave |