Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
ve2pid wrote:
Hi ot all It is well known that the real ground seems to ''reflects'' a radio wave. But I think that the term ''reflects'' is a bit confusing. My understanding of the phenomenon is that the ground absorbs the incident wave and, with that energy it re-radiates a new wave with a different phase/amplitude value. Not quite. The wave creates a current in the ground which produces a field. For most ground types, the field which is produced resembles a reflection that's altered in magnitude and phase. That new wave modifies the TO angle as a real optical-type reflection would do. Then, it seems that it is not a ''bending'' of the wave, but the production of a new one. With the value of the modification of the TO angle, one can deduces a ''reflected'' wave's angle, even if it not a real reflection.. Am I right? At any point in space, the total field is the sum of the original wave and the "reflected wave". This sum is different from the original wave, and the amount and way in which it's different depends on the point in space. If by "TO angle" you mean the elevation angle at which radiation is maximum, yes, that angle is often modified by the reflection because of the different magnitude and phase of the reflection at each elevation angle. Also, I read in a older version of the ARRL's Handbook that ''The effective ground plane, that is the plane from which ground reflections can be considered to take place, seldom is the actual surface of the ground, but a few feet below it, depending upon the characteristics of the soil.'' I hope that's not in the current versions of the Handbook. Considering what I said about re-routing with phase/amplitude modifications, how to interpret the text form the Handbook? How to determine the depth of that 'effective gorund plane'? Or is there any depth at all? As is, it could be interpreted as a optical reflection like occuring somewhere deep in the real ground.. I have no idea in what way an "effective ground plane" is "effective". You can't put a perfect ground plane at any depth and get the same reflection as you do from dirt. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Safety ground versus RF ground for a 2nd Floor shack | Antenna | |||
Reflection Loss | Antenna | |||
Transforming your simple Ground Rod into a Ground Anchor : Is It Worth The Work ? - You Decide ! | Shortwave | |||
Ground Or Not To Ground Receiving Antenna In Storm ? | Antenna | |||
Reflection Coefficient | Antenna |