Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm building a turnstile in the 1GHz range. The length of the coax
for the 90* phasing loop is too short to work with easily. Would I get the same results using a phasing loop 270* in length? Ralph |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... I'm building a turnstile in the 1GHz range. The length of the coax for the 90* phasing loop is too short to work with easily. Would I get the same results using a phasing loop 270* in length? Ralph Yes, I am curious, what are you using to verify that your harness has the proper delay. At these frequencies I would want a vector voltmeter or network analyzer to check. Jimmie |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
yes, but it will rotate the opposite way.
wrote in message ... I'm building a turnstile in the 1GHz range. The length of the coax for the 90* phasing loop is too short to work with easily. Would I get the same results using a phasing loop 270* in length? Ralph |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... I'm building a turnstile in the 1GHz range. The length of the coax for the 90* phasing loop is too short to work with easily. Would I get the same results using a phasing loop 270* in length? Ralph Hi Ralph Could you consider constructing your Turnstile so the "phasing loop" is a straight length of coax, about 2 inches long seperating the two (crossed) dipoles? Jerry |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On Sun, 17 Jun 2007 17:08:58 GMT, "Jerry Martes" wrote: wrote in message .. . I'm building a turnstile in the 1GHz range. The length of the coax for the 90* phasing loop is too short to work with easily. Would I get the same results using a phasing loop 270* in length? Ralph Hi Ralph Could you consider constructing your Turnstile so the "phasing loop" is a straight length of coax, about 2 inches long seperating the two (crossed) dipoles? Jerry I figured 1.8 inches for 1066 MHz. I wanted to build it into a pvc pipe cap so there isn't much room to work. Also, am I correct to assume the 1.8 is the total length, including what is stripped back to make the connection? Ralph |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... On Sun, 17 Jun 2007 17:08:58 GMT, "Jerry Martes" wrote: wrote in message . .. I'm building a turnstile in the 1GHz range. The length of the coax for the 90* phasing loop is too short to work with easily. Would I get the same results using a phasing loop 270* in length? Ralph Hi Ralph Could you consider constructing your Turnstile so the "phasing loop" is a straight length of coax, about 2 inches long seperating the two (crossed) dipoles? Jerry I figured 1.8 inches for 1066 MHz. I wanted to build it into a pvc pipe cap so there isn't much room to work. Also, am I correct to assume the 1.8 is the total length, including what is stripped back to make the connection? Ralph Hi Ralph I dont know what your needs are for this Turnstile antenna, so my input may be of no value. But, a Turnstile can be made to work by feeding both dipoles with one feed point. No phasing harness is needed. Make one dipole a little short so it is capacitive and the other dipole a little long so it is inducvtive. Jerry |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 17, 12:47 pm, "Jerry Martes" wrote:
I figured 1.8 inches for 1066 MHz. I wanted to build it into a pvc pipe cap so there isn't much room to work. Also, am I correct to assume the 1.8 is the total length, including what is stripped back to make the connection? Ralph Hi Ralph I dont know what your needs are for this Turnstile antenna, so my input may be of no value. But, a Turnstile can be made to work by feeding both dipoles with one feed point. No phasing harness is needed. Make one dipole a little short so it is capacitive and the other dipole a little long so it is inducvtive. Jerry The only problem with that is the antenna will still have basically a dipole pattern. I assume he is wanting the usual omni pattern with circular polarization at the higher angles.. But maybe not... You need the phase line if you want a true omni "turnstile" pattern. But saying that , I have used turnstiles with no line.. But usually on 80m.. And it does change the pattern a bit from the original single dipole, but not quite the same as using a phase line. MK |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... On Jun 17, 12:47 pm, "Jerry Martes" wrote: I figured 1.8 inches for 1066 MHz. I wanted to build it into a pvc pipe cap so there isn't much room to work. Also, am I correct to assume the 1.8 is the total length, including what is stripped back to make the connection? Ralph Hi Ralph I dont know what your needs are for this Turnstile antenna, so my input may be of no value. But, a Turnstile can be made to work by feeding both dipoles with one feed point. No phasing harness is needed. Make one dipole a little short so it is capacitive and the other dipole a little long so it is inducvtive. Jerry The only problem with that is the antenna will still have basically a dipole pattern. I assume he is wanting the usual omni pattern with circular polarization at the higher angles.. But maybe not... You need the phase line if you want a true omni "turnstile" pattern. But saying that , I have used turnstiles with no line.. But usually on 80m.. And it does change the pattern a bit from the original single dipole, but not quite the same as using a phase line. MK Hi MK I may have screwed up, but I think that a pair of dipoles on the same plane, configured like a pair of non-symetrical Vs could be fed with one feed point to produce a free space cardiod pattern. That would be one short dipole and one one longer dipole fed in parallel. Jerry Jerry |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|