Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old June 24th 07, 07:45 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Aug 2006
Posts: 106
Default Calculation of received power in the far field

On 24 jun, 16:36, "Richard Fry" wrote:
"Wimpie" wrote A broadcast transmitter (100 MHz) with ERP = 10kW produces
about 30mV/m at 3 miles and h=5 ft.


____________

Although you didn't define the height of the transmit antenna, just picking
a height of 984 feet to be on the high side, and referring to the FCC's
F(50,50) propagation curves shows that for 10 kW ERP a field of about 42
mV/m will be generated at a radius of 3 miles and an elevation of 9 meters
(29.5 feet) above the earth, assuming flat terrain.

Field strength at lower elevations for these conditions varies about in an
inverse relationship with height, so at 5 feet it would be 5/29.5, or 17% of
42 mV/m, which is about 7 mV/m.

This is quite a bit different than your number, so I was curious as to your
method.

RF


Hi Richard,

I was a little bit lazy to look into the propagation curves and do the
correction for terrain roughness. I live in the middle part of the
Netherlands where the country is really flat. Therefore I just took
the two-ray formula (and checked that the result is below free space
propagation). Normally spoken when I do not have reliable propagation
curves at hand, I use the two ray formula and add about 10..20 dB to
the loss.

The calculation example was just to show how (the procedure) someone
can calculate the received power from a non-resonant whip (that was
the original question). When using the FCC 50% curves, the output
would be even less (as your example showed).


In my previous posting I said:
"Using one of the above methods, will result in E is proportional to 1/
r^3...to 1/r^4. This matches measurements I did myself. Therefore 1/r
gives a far from realistic result (too optimistic)."

That had to be be:
"Using one of the above methods, will result in Preceived is
proportional to 1/r^3...to 1/r^4. This matches measurements I did
myself. Therefore 1/r^2 gives a far from realistic result (too
optimistic)."

Best regards,

Wim
PA3DJS.
www.tetech.nl




Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Available power from an RF field Ron Antenna 9 September 21st 04 12:46 AM
For Sale: Lafayette SWR/Power/Field Strength Meter Bill Equipment 0 December 11th 03 01:37 AM
For Sale: Lafayette SWR/Power/Field Strength Meter Bill Equipment 0 December 11th 03 01:37 AM
For Sale: Lafayette SWR/Power/Field Strength Meter Bill Antenna 0 December 11th 03 01:36 AM
For Sale: Lafayette SWR/Power/Field Strength Meter Bill Swap 0 December 11th 03 01:36 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:34 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017