Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have installed a FAA approved NDB beacon here at our private
airport located in Manchester,TN . The Beacon is transmitting on 529 KHZ Carrier power is 50 watts the facility Id is : LYQ I have shunt feed a 120 foot high Rhon 25G tower. The tap wire (3/8 dia aluminum 'power line' cable) is at the 90 foot level runs down the face of the tower with 24 inch spacing to the matching network. I am using the 'Gamma' match network : the SWR is down to 1.2 or so. The top of the tower has 4 ten foot radials The base of the tower has 8 200 foot 3/ 8 inch aluminum cable radials we plan to add more. The tower has a 3/8 'power line' type cable from the top to the base to ensure bonding of each section. When I fly the Company's Jetstar from 1000 to 41,000 feet, I get solid points on the RMI indicator: when I pass right over the beacon tower the RMI needle swings to the tail indicating positive station passage. The problem is the range of the LYQ beacon it seems to work 10 miles or less??? The airplane has dual ADF systems that work perfect. As an aside, 10 miles away, is another ADF beacon on 332 KHZ 25 watts! using the traditional three strand 'flat top' suspended between two telephone poles. The vertical radiator for this beacon is less than 60 feet high : I can track the beacon out to 70 miles or so! Is a shunt feed tower lossy??? poor radiator??? comments??? I am a Ham op WA4SZE : by the way, we will QSL the beacon when we get it commissioned. Thanks!! |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 4, 8:45 pm, wrote:
wrote: I have installed a FAA approved NDBbeaconhere at our private airport located in Manchester,TN . TheBeaconis transmitting on 529 KHZ Carrier power is 50 watts the facility Id is : LYQ I have shunt feed a 120 foot high Rhon 25G tower. The tap wire (3/8 dia aluminum 'power line' cable) is at the 90 foot level runs down the face of the tower with 24 inch spacing to the matching network. I am using the 'Gamma' match network : the SWR is down to 1.2 or so. The top of the tower has 4 ten foot radials The base of the tower has 8 200 foot 3/ 8 inch aluminum cable radials we plan to add more. The tower has a 3/8 'power line' type cable from the top to the base to ensure bonding of each section. When I fly the Company's Jetstar from 1000 to 41,000 feet, I get solid points on the RMI indicator: when I pass right over thebeacontower the RMI needle swings to the tail indicating positive station passage. The problem is the range of the LYQ beaconit seems to work 10 miles or less??? The airplane has dual ADF systems that work perfect. As an aside, 10 miles away, is another ADFbeaconon 332 KHZ 25 watts! using the traditional three strand 'flat top' suspended between two telephone poles. The vertical radiator for thisbeaconis less than 60 feet high : I can track thebeaconout to 70 miles or so! Is a shunt feed tower lossy??? poor radiator??? comments??? I am a Ham op WA4SZE : by the way, we will QSL thebeaconwhen we get it commissioned. Thanks!! More radials certainly won't hurt, especially since at this freq 200 feet is short. What's the ground around it like? -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. open land flat, somewhat damp covered with grass the radials lay on top of the ground The beacon is on air right now going to leave it on tonight for reception reports do you think a shunt feed tower is not good?? I could jack up the tower and insulate from ground it then series feed do you think that would be better??? lots of work but might be worth the effort! |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 4, 8:59 pm, wrote:
On Jul 4, 8:45 pm, wrote: wrote: I have installed a FAA approved NDBbeaconhere at our private airport located in Manchester,TN . TheBeaconis transmitting on 529 KHZ Carrier power is 50 watts the facility Id is : LYQ I have shunt feed a 120 foot high Rhon 25G tower. The tap wire (3/8 dia aluminum 'power line' cable) is at the 90 foot level runs down the face of the tower with 24 inch spacing to the matching network. I am using the 'Gamma' match network : the SWR is down to 1.2 or so. The top of the tower has 4 ten foot radials The base of the tower has 8 200 foot 3/ 8 inch aluminum cable radials we plan to add more. The tower has a 3/8 'power line' type cable from the top to the base to ensure bonding of each section. When I fly the Company's Jetstar from 1000 to 41,000 feet, I get solid points on the RMI indicator: when I pass right over thebeacontower the RMI needle swings to the tail indicating positive station passage. The problem is the range of the LYQ beaconit seems to work 10 miles or less??? The airplane has dual ADF systems that work perfect. As an aside, 10 miles away, is another ADFbeaconon 332 KHZ 25 watts! using the traditional three strand 'flat top' suspended between two telephone poles. The vertical radiator for thisbeaconis less than 60 feet high : I can track thebeaconout to 70 miles or so! Is a shunt feed tower lossy??? poor radiator??? comments??? I am a Ham op WA4SZE : by the way, we will QSL thebeaconwhen we get it commissioned. Thanks!! More radials certainly won't hurt, especially since at this freq 200 feet is short. What's the ground around it like? -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. open land flat, somewhat damp covered with grass the radials lay on top of the ground Thebeaconis on air right now going to leave it on tonight for reception reports do you think a shunt feed tower is not good?? I could jack up the tower and insulate from ground it then series feed do you think that would be better??? lots of work but might be worth the effort! As an aside, I wonder if this is proof that a shunt feed tower is no good??? I can SEE the tower (runway) over the nose of the airplane at 15 miles out! yet the RMI indicator is wandering! The beacon ID is in the noise! I get a good match but the band width is NARROW! this indicates to me that the Q is high just as it should be? the RF amp meter is showing current thru the vertical run up the tower face if your careless around the 2300 pf vac cap you get a nice RF burn. By the way, I made a mistake, I am using an omega match the values of the caps: C-1 500 pf ( from 50 ohm coax center conductor to 2300 PF Vac Var cap ) C-2 2300 pf vertical wire run thru C-2 2300 pf cap then ground thanks!!!! |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
As an aside, I wonder if this is proof that a shunt feed tower is no
good??? I can SEE the tower (runway) over the nose of the airplane at 15 miles out! yet the RMI indicator is wandering! The beacon ID is in the noise! I get a good match but the band width is NARROW! this indicates to me that the Q is high just as it should be? the RF amp meter is showing current thru the vertical run up the tower face if your careless around the 2300 pf vac cap you get a nice RF burn. By the way, I made a mistake, I am using an omega match the values of the caps: C-1 500 pf ( from 50 ohm coax center conductor to 2300 PF Vac Var cap ) C-2 2300 pf vertical wire run thru C-2 2300 pf cap then ground thanks!!!! I have just run a preliminary NEC model. I am showing a gain of -9 dBi at an elevation angle of 10 deg. at 530 kHz. Directly overhead the gain is about -26 dBi. A typical matching network should have a loss of about 4 dB, for a TRP of around 1 W or so. The input impedance will be about 0.2+j176. You should have about 10 A RMS in the base of the gamma match vertical wire and, 1.7 kV RMS , assuming a 4 dB loss in the matching network. My model needs some refinement, but should give a ball park idea of what to expect. I did not understand exactly how you are using two capacitors to match the antenna. Regards, Frank (VE6CB) |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 4, 5:56 pm, wrote:
Is a shunt feed tower lossy??? poor radiator??? comments??? I am a Ham op WA4SZE : by the way, we will QSL the beacon when we get it commissioned. Thanks!! The tower would not be the most efficient thing, being a 1/4 wave at that freq is about 442 ft. The four 10 ft radials, which I assume are a top hat, will be fairly useless at that freq. Too short to really do any good. How long is the top horizontal wire is the "T" they are using at the other airport? I bet it's pretty long across. What I would do if possible, is lengthen the top hat wires to be as long as you can. There does not really have to be four.. Two is enough, as you can see from the other station. I don't know what the current distribution is with that setup, but it would seem that max current is at your matching device. The longer you can make that tower look electrically, the better. I'm not sure what the norm is for the usual NDB antenna systems.. I would basically use the same measures I would running a short mobile whip.. Longer top hat wires would greatly help current distribution if they are long enough. To resonate the tower at that freq with no coil loading, you would need wires about 315 ft... :/ But you could use shorter, and compromise a bit. The ground is pretty important, but I think the current distribution across the tower equally so. I think all your current is huddled up around your matching device, and ground area.. Not really where you want it. MK |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
WA4SZEwrote
I have installed a FAA approved NDB beacon here at our private airport located in Manchester,TN .... Is a shunt feed tower lossy??? poor radiator??? comments??? _____________ Other things equal, a shunt fed MW vertical monopole can produce essentially the same radiation pattern shape and gain as when series fed. The link below leads to an analysis of what might be expected for either case for the system you described. Assumptions made in the analysis: 1) The four top-hat radials added 10 feet to the electrical height of the tower 2) The ground radials described have a net r-f resistance of 25 ohms at the operating frequency. The analysis shows that for 50 watts of available power, this system could generate an inverse-distance groundwave field strength of better than 700 µV/m at a radius of about 15 miles. Of course, earth losses along the groundwave path will reduce that value, but even with 6 dB of additional loss the field should still be better than 350 µV/m, and higher than that for higher elevations above the earth at that distance (as would be true for airborne receive systems). The performance you are describing indicates that the antenna is not radiating much of the available power, which may point to problems with the feed system. http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h8...alRadiator.gif RF |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
WA4SZE wrote:
"I have shunt fed a 120 foot high Rohn 25G tower." The Rohn has a 1-ft face, so the h/d is about 120. That`s OK. What`s wacko is a 23-degree tower over (8) 200-ft radials at 529 KHz. Ground connection resistance is high and eating up all the signal. Shunt - feeding is OK. Bill Orr and Stu Cowan give feed capacitors for scalimg in "All About Vertical Antennas". Brown, Lewis and Epstein would be disappointed with your radials. Shoot for the broadcast practice of (120) evenly distributed around from the tower base. A short tower radiates almost as well as a 1/4-wave. but it has a very low radiation resistance so can`t tolerate any loss resistance. Kraus gives advice for Electrically Small Antennas in the 3rd edition of "Antennas". Page 710 says: "To increase the radiation efficiency requires an increase in the radiation resistance Rr or a decrease in the loss resistance Rl or both. The SWR of a dummy load usually looks fine, but radiation is just incidental. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Richard Harrison" wrote
Brown, Lewis and Epstein would be disappointed with your radials. Shoot for the broadcast practice of (120) evenly distributed around from the tower base. _________ BL&E's 1937 measurements show (Fig 30) that a vertical monopole of 25 to 90 electrical degrees used with 113 buried radials each of 0.412 wavelength produced a measured groundwave field within a few percent of the theoretical maximum for such radiators over a perfect ground (notwithstanding that the conductivity at their test site was around 4 mS/m). In Fig 32 of that paper it can be seen that if the 113 radials are only 0.274-wavelengths long, then at the 25-degree electrical height of this Rohn tower, the measured field was about 79% of theoretical field over a perfect ground. .. So it's not just the number of radials that is important, but also their length. The referenced figures are linked below, under the "fair use" provisions of copyright law. http://s62.photobucket.com/albums/h8...BLERadials.gif RF |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here is the correct link to BL&E Figs 30 and 32.
http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h8...ndERadials.gif |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Shunt fed vertical? | Antenna | |||
Shunt Feeding a Tower for Top Band | Antenna | |||
shunt fed AM Sticks | Broadcasting | |||
tower shunt feed for 160m | Antenna | |||
FL 2100B shunt value? | Boatanchors |