Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just had some interesting reading on moon dust, mars dust e.t.c
I am amased that scientists had not figured out what the dust really is. Actually it fits very nicely in my thesis where errent particles fly thru space in swarm form as per radio communication. Just one thing escapes me and that is particles pointed at the moons surface which penetrate the extreme earths fields and then go on to hit the moon and then reflect back. Yet on the moons surface are zillians of these static particles stuck to its surface. The question is thus why is the moon which is covered with static particles also allow static particles to deflect? I don't know to much about the moon but this would suggest the moon has a minimum gravitational pull . Not enough strength to totally absorb the impact of static particles which are then allowed to bounce back to earth where it becomes atached to diagmatic materials in radio antenna form. This fits my thesis on radio propagation. What really bothers me is that people in the space industry seem to not have any inclination of the nature of this dus tis.. Anybody aware of papers that discuss the phenomina of surface covering materials of orbiting masses in the Universe? I sure would appreciate pointers where the specifications of surface dust is located together with comparisons to that covering other orbiting units in the universe. Art |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Another deep question regarding the universe | Antenna | |||
orbiting space suit on 145.99 | Scanner | |||
Best FAQ for the whole universe, and all contemporaneous (parallel) universes | Homebrew | |||
Surface mount ? | Homebrew | |||
< |
Scanner |