Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Rick (W-A-one-R-K-T)" wrote in
news ![]() In the 2007 ARRL Handbook page 3.6, there is a discussion of building a ground ring around the base of the tower, connected to three ground rods each connected to each leg of the tower. In the narrative it says "Space rods at least 6 feet apart" but then in the caption for the accompanying drawing it says Locate ground rods on the ring as close as possible to their respective tower legs". On a Rohn 25G, the rods can't be "as close as possible" to their respective tower legs and still be anywhere near 6 feet apart. So, which is it ... close to their respective tower legs, or 6 feet apart? What is the reason for the 6-foot separation, anyway? The rods all go into the ground. Why would it make a difference if they're closer together than 6 feet? The electrodes are placed in a quite resistive medium. Increasing the diameter of an electrode does reduce the resistance of the earth connection but by very little. Fig 1 at http://www.vk1od.net/post/earthing.htm shows the effect of different diameters on electrode resistance. If you place a second electrode right next to an existing one, you will obtain almost no reduction in resistance to earth, it is not a lot different to increasing the diameter of the electrode. At increased spacing, the improvement is better and at large spacing aproaches halving the resistance of the single electrode, but offset to some extent by the inductance and resistance of the connecting conductor. In homogenous ground (and that is some assumption), it turns out that increasing the spacing of driven vertical electrods beyond their own length is of quickly diminishing benefit, so a common ROT is to drive electrodes in a matrix of cell size about the length of the rods. Someone else raised the issue of step voltage (the voltage between your feet when you walk on ground carrying a large current). That is usually mitigated by a (amongst other things) a conductive earth mat layed on the surface and bonded to the electrode system. Nevertheless, it is not a good idea for two people to carry a length of pipe (or a beam) over ground subject to fault currents or likely lightning discharge. So back to your specific question, if you place the three electrodes close to each other (as a consequency of placing them at the tower legs), the earth resistance is higher than it should be with greater spacing. If you space them too far, the added inductance of the conductor connecting them offsets to some extent the reduction in electrode resistance. I haven't read the article to which you refer, but I wouldn't waste time driving an electrode less than 2.4m, and I would not bother driving a 2.4m electrode electrode within 2.4m of another. Electrodes are real cheap, and excluding rock, you can drive them with an electric hammer and an adapter in minutes. You are trying to shed discharge current to earth, so don't be shy about it. Owen |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
US Tower TX-472 Base question | Antenna | |||
Ground rods.at HF | Antenna | |||
Old Wives' Tales & Ground Rods | Antenna | |||
Gas lines and ground rods | Antenna | |||
Ground rods in rocky soil | Antenna |