Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Owen Duffy wrote:
"Rick (W-A-one-R-K-T)" wrote in news ![]() On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 17:23:13 +0000, Walter Maxwell wrote: This topic has aroused my curiosity. As a grounding device, why would a solid rod be better than a hollow pipe, except for the current carrying capability? Good afternoon, Walt. The thing is, the current carrying capability for transient events like lightning strikes should be about the same for the same diameter pipe or rod, since most of the current is carried in skin effect anyway. I think that is flawed thinking. A lighning down conductor needs to carry something like 20kA for 100ms, so it needs to be substantial enough that it doesn't melt and remains in place to protect against the next strike. Owen The fusing/melting current for 1/2" copper pipe is probably well above 20kA, even for 100ms pulses. A more interesting potential failure mode might be from the mechanical forces due to the magnetic field. (see, e.g., quarter shrinking or can-crushing) |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Building a Solid Copper Ground Pipe {Tube} with an Solid Iron Core. - Also - Water Drilling a Solid Copper Pipe for a Ground Rod. | Shortwave | |||
Building a Solid Copper Ground Pipe {Tube} with an Solid IronC... | Shortwave | |||
Cold Water Pipe Ground? | Antenna | |||
Ground rod or water pipe? | Antenna | |||
Antenna Tuner/Coupler Ground ... Hot Water Pipe? | Antenna |