Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 16, 7:04 am, (Rick) wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 18:43:14 GMT, "Amerigo Vespucci" wrote: I tried pruning the antenna a couple of inches and fiddled with the feeder line and manged to get mr SWR's down below two but with a tuner I'm still not happy. My rig is a Kenwood TS 530S so the finals are a little more forgiving Amerigo, Are you expecting that if you get the SWR lower your finals will run cooler? Because the reflected power into them will be less? (Hey Walt !! We need you) Rick K2XT If it were solid state, I can see wanting to get below 2:1 a bit.. Gives you more usable bandwidth. But for the hybrid kenwoods with 6146's, it really doesn't matter. Improving his match from 2:1 will not really make any difference at all. With those radios, as long as the load can be matched with the "LOAD" control within it's normal setting range, it's good nuff. I doubt a 2:1 load is off enough to hurt a pair of those tubes as far as any extra heat. The radios have a fan. So.. He can improve it, if he doesn't have anything else to do, but I would not expect it to make any real difference, except that the "LOAD" control will end up being in it's more normal appx 1/3 to 1/2 setting rather than lower, or higher. It will not effect his signal at all. Any difference would be unnoticable. MK |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
zepp antenne | Dx | |||
End Fed Zepp Antenna | Antenna | |||
Extended Double Zepp | Antenna | |||
Extended Double Zepp | Antenna | |||
double double (bi)quad - feed impedance? | Antenna |