Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Please see subject line-- Help, Wifi Antenna-- on
alt.binaires.schematics.electronic for a picture of my concept. Looking to combine Helical antenna and Wifi adapter card in one unit. My experience is limited to MW bcb. I know there are many pitfalls at 2.4Ghz, so I'm looking for feedback on how to do this properly. I'm using the following page as my guide. http://www.wlan.org.uk/jhecker.html This is to extend the range of my laptop computer. Mike |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
amdx wrote:
alt.binaires.schematics.electronic for a picture of my concept. Looking to combine Helical antenna and Wifi adapter card in one unit. My experience is limited to MW bcb. I know there are many pitfalls at 2.4Ghz, so I'm looking for feedback on how to do this properly. I'm using the following page as my guide. http://www.wlan.org.uk/jhecker.html Note that in almost all places there are legal limitations on EIRP (Effective Incident Radiated Power). In plain English, the more you narrow a signal, the stronger it becomes. Since you did not say where you are, I'll mention the two places I know for sure. In the U.S. WiFi EIRP is limited to 1 watt for mobile/portable use (e.g. laptops) and 4 watts for fixed links. With a 100mW source and a reasonablyshort cable the famous Pringles can antenna would be illegal for mobile/portable use and probably illegal for fixed links. It happened to be developed by an FBI agent in the process of an investigation, so he was covered, you may not be. Here in Israel it is limited to 100mw EIRP, so unless you have a very long cable, any gain antenna would be illegal. Someone wrote up (in Hebrew) and posted on a web site his use of a similar antenna. It's not obvious to the casual reader that he did it in an area under the jursidiction of the IDF (Israeli Army) and got permission from them. Geoff. -- Geoffrey S. Mendelson, Jerusalem, Israel N3OWJ/4X1GM IL Voice: (07)-7424-1667 U.S. Voice: 1-215-821-1838 Visit my 'blog at http://geoffstechno.livejournal.com/ |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Note that in almost all places there are legal limitations on EIRP (Effective Incident Radiated Power). In plain English, the more you narrow a signal, the stronger it becomes. Since you did not say where you are, I'll mention the two places I know for sure. In the U.S. WiFi EIRP is limited to 1 watt for mobile/portable use (e.g. laptops) and 4 watts for fixed links. Bear in mind that 2.4GHz is also an amateur band where no erp limits exist!! Jeff |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 18:12:26 +0100, Jeff wrote:
Note that in almost all places there are legal limitations on EIRP (Effective Incident Radiated Power). In plain English, the more you narrow a signal, the stronger it becomes. Since you did not say where you are, I'll mention the two places I know for sure. In the U.S. WiFi EIRP is limited to 1 watt for mobile/portable use (e.g. laptops) and 4 watts for fixed links. Bear in mind that 2.4GHz is also an amateur band where no erp limits exist!! Oh , really ?! cite! |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
That may be true but to use it that way legally you would need an
amateur license, and this is not just a paperwork exercise, you have to pass FCC exams covering electronics and radio theory (plus laws and regulations) to get one. For most people, it's not an option. Allodoxaphobia wrote: On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 18:12:26 +0100, Jeff wrote: Note that in almost all places there are legal limitations on EIRP (Effective Incident Radiated Power). In plain English, the more you narrow a signal, the stronger it becomes. Since you did not say where you are, I'll mention the two places I know for sure. In the U.S. WiFi EIRP is limited to 1 watt for mobile/portable use (e.g. laptops) and 4 watts for fixed links. Bear in mind that 2.4GHz is also an amateur band where no erp limits exist!! Oh , really ?! cite! |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Barry Watzman" wrote in message
... That may be true but to use it that way legally you would need an amateur license, and this is not just a paperwork exercise, you have to pass FCC exams covering electronics and radio theory (plus laws and regulations) to get one. For most people, it's not an option. Very few people would have significnat difficulty passing the technician class license exam that's needed to operate on 2.4GHz. Indeed, there are many month-long (meet a couple times a week) classes and even weekend "cram" classes that have near 100% success rates in getting people their tickets. A passing score is 80%! |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Barry Watzman wrote in news:46a7981e$0$30632
: That may be true but to use it that way legally you would need an amateur license, and this is not just a paperwork exercise, you have to pass FCC exams covering electronics and radio theory (plus laws and regulations) to get one. For most people, it's not an option. And when you do get that license, you are, by lay, limited on what you can communicate. IMO. boosting your home wi-fi unser the auspices of an Amateur Radio License is a no-no. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Allodoxaphobia" wrote in message ... On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 18:12:26 +0100, Jeff wrote: Note that in almost all places there are legal limitations on EIRP (Effective Incident Radiated Power). In plain English, the more you narrow a signal, the stronger it becomes. Since you did not say where you are, I'll mention the two places I know for sure. In the U.S. WiFi EIRP is limited to 1 watt for mobile/portable use (e.g. laptops) and 4 watts for fixed links. Bear in mind that 2.4GHz is also an amateur band where no erp limits exist!! Oh , really ?! cite! Channels 1 to 6 lie with the 13cms amateur band, which does vary a little from country to country nut in the UK is 2310-2450MHz, and there is no ERP restriction in this band just a max power to the antenna, which can have as much gain as you can muster. Jeff |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 09:15:44 +0100, Jeff wrote:
"Allodoxaphobia" wrote in message ... On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 18:12:26 +0100, Jeff wrote: Note that in almost all places there are legal limitations on EIRP (Effective Incident Radiated Power). In plain English, the more you narrow a signal, the stronger it becomes. Since you did not say where you are, I'll mention the two places I know for sure. In the U.S. WiFi EIRP is limited to 1 watt for mobile/portable use (e.g. laptops) and 4 watts for fixed links. Bear in mind that 2.4GHz is also an amateur band where no erp limits exist!! Oh , really ?! cite! Channels 1 to 6 lie with the 13cms amateur band, which does vary a little from country to country nut in the UK is 2310-2450MHz, and there is no ERP restriction in this band just a max power to the antenna, which can have as much gain as you can muster. For amateur radio, it's a limit on DC power to the final amplifier, which you can make as efficient as you want; it's average power, so you can run 2 KW PEP (peak envelope power) SSB, and gawd knows what kinds of pulses you're allowed to transmit on the UHF, SHF, and EHF bands, as long as the average isn't over 1 KW input to the final. I'm sure it's all covered in the FCC regs, which should be easy to look up for anyone who's really that interested. ;-) Cheers! Rich |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jeff wrote:
Note that in almost all places there are legal limitations on EIRP (Effective Incident Radiated Power). In plain English, the more you narrow a signal, the stronger it becomes. Since you did not say where you are, I'll mention the two places I know for sure. In the U.S. WiFi EIRP is limited to 1 watt for mobile/portable use (e.g. laptops) and 4 watts for fixed links. Bear in mind that 2.4GHz is also an amateur band where no erp limits exist!! Only 802.11b/g channels 1-6 fall in the amateur allocation of 2390-2450 MHz. If operating under amateur regulations you must identify by CW, phone, RTTY or TV image every 10 minutes or less (see 47CFR97.119), your transmissions must be intended for reception by another licensed amateur station or station authorized to communicate with amateur stations (see 47CFR97.111), that has to be the only reasonable way to effectively communicate, no other radio service available that accomplishes the same communications (see 47CFR97.113) and you have to use the lowest power level capable of accomplishing the communications (see 47CFR97.313). See http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/w...7cfr97_01.html for specific regulations. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Convert DISH TV antenna for WIFI use. USB or RF FEED? | Antenna | |||
Center-fed dipole wifi antenna | Antenna | |||
SolderSmoke #31: Jupiter, WIFI antenna, Kootie keys, QRSS, NEW VIDEO | Boatanchors | |||
Dipole antenna lobes question (wifi base in this example) | Antenna | |||
scanner antenna for WiFi? | Scanner |