Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Have a MFJ-1026 noise canceling signal enhancer and have determined that the
only way it can really achieve the desired results in most cases is with a remote antenna. I use a 40 meter double extended center feed zepp on 80 and 40 meters with great results. Recent birdies (Noise) from a man made product which I can not track down gives me S-9+ signals on 80 meters and around S-7 on 40 every 17 kc's. I have read were some success using a 20 meter dipole has provide a strong enough signal for the MFJ to be effective. I am thinking of using a 40 meter dipole 40 feet lower than the Zepp and around 40 feet parallel to the Zepp. That large of a antenna however might induce to much RF on the Aux antenna connected to the MFJ and cause future problems. Looking for recommendations from users of the ANC-4 or MFJ-1025 or 1026. Your input will be appreciated, thanks in advance. 73 - Ron W4LDE |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Mobile Ant L match ? | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |