Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rick (W-A-one-R-K-T) wrote:
On page 7-10 of the ARRL Antenna Book 20th Edition, there is a discussion of "Off-Center-Fed Dipoles". It shows a dipole 130 feet long, fed 45.3 feet (a bit over 1/3 wavelength) from one end with a 4:1 balun, then coax to the shack, and used on 80 thru 20. I'm wondering if I can feed that with ladder line instead of coax and balun. It's not a "balanced" antenna (if there even is such a thing in the real world) so maybe ladder line isn't a good choice here, but it would make the installation a bit easier... My experience with this antenna (fed with 300-ohm TV twinlead, which was all I could afford at age 16) was electrifying. Using a DX-20 transmitter, I was able to draw nice sparks on 20 mtrs. You may want to do some pruning to find a length that will keep RF out of the shack. My own preference would be to center-feed the 130-foot flat-top with ladder-line and use a link-coupled transmatch to work 80 through 10, including WARC, and not worry about coax losses. You'll be the proud owner of a "Zepp!" 73---W9NPI |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The whole idea of the OCF is to moderate the wild excursions of impedance
that is so typical of a center fed antenna operated at even harmonics. I've used both over the years (OCF and Center Fed). I prefer the OCF for general use and the balanced fed dipole for best overall performance. I will say the impedance excursions of the dipole were annoying (of course, one can always employs Cecil's trick and avoid the problem completely). Cecil approach, while effective, makes the entire project more and more complicated. For a "throw it up and use it" approach, the coax fed OCF is hard to beat. It works and presents impedances that are typically handled quite easily by even the minimal tuners incorporated into many of today's radios. I use a 135' OCF and have no trouble matching it at all (it's a CW-80 Carolina Windom). I have found its performance on 80/40/30 to be quite good. ....hasan, N0AN "afcsman" wrote in message ... Rick (W-A-one-R-K-T) wrote: On page 7-10 of the ARRL Antenna Book 20th Edition, there is a discussion of "Off-Center-Fed Dipoles". It shows a dipole 130 feet long, fed 45.3 feet (a bit over 1/3 wavelength) from one end with a 4:1 balun, then coax to the shack, and used on 80 thru 20. I'm wondering if I can feed that with ladder line instead of coax and balun. It's not a "balanced" antenna (if there even is such a thing in the real world) so maybe ladder line isn't a good choice here, but it would make the installation a bit easier... My experience with this antenna (fed with 300-ohm TV twinlead, which was all I could afford at age 16) was electrifying. Using a DX-20 transmitter, I was able to draw nice sparks on 20 mtrs. You may want to do some pruning to find a length that will keep RF out of the shack. My own preference would be to center-feed the 130-foot flat-top with ladder-line and use a link-coupled transmatch to work 80 through 10, including WARC, and not worry about coax losses. You'll be the proud owner of a "Zepp!" 73---W9NPI |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Length of Dipole / Inverted Vee with Ladder Line | Antenna | |||
Dipole and Ladder Line Matching | Antenna | |||
Using Twin Lead or Ladder Line for your Antenna's Feed-in-Line ? - Then 'consider' a Pair of Vintage Style TV Antenna Clips . . . | Shortwave | |||
Feed Line Length - Ladder Line | Antenna | |||
Coax Length for G5RV and Center Support for Ladder Line ? | Antenna |