RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Antenna (https://www.radiobanter.com/antenna/)
-   -   2L Steppir or 2L Cubical quad (https://www.radiobanter.com/antenna/122909-2l-steppir-2l-cubical-quad.html)

Francis Pinson August 5th 07 01:25 PM

2L Steppir or 2L Cubical quad
 
Tks to read.

What is the best choice for 5 bands (10 to 20m) : 2L Steppir or 2L cubical
quad ?

What do you think about this ?..... It is for my holidays home...

Nice to read you ... Tks to all

Best 73/DX

Frank



Rick August 5th 07 02:23 PM

2L Steppir or 2L Cubical quad
 

What is the best choice for 5 bands (10 to 20m) : 2L Steppir or 2L cubical
quad ?


SteppIR. In fact the 3 element is even better, and the 4 element is better
than the 3 element.

Rick K2XT

^-^ johan ^-^ August 5th 07 02:49 PM

2L Steppir or 2L Cubical quad
 
Rick bracht volgend idée uit :
What is the best choice for 5 bands (10 to 20m) : 2L Steppir or 2L cubical
quad ?


SteppIR. In fact the 3 element is even better, and the 4 element is better
than the 3 element.

Rick K2XT


Or the ultimate : The MonstIR

--
grtz johan



Bill Ogden August 5th 07 05:56 PM

2L Steppir or 2L Cubical quad
 
Not an easy question. I have used both a 2L quad (Cubix) and a 3L SteppIR.

Although I cannot quantify it, I felt the quad was a better receiving
antenna for dealing with very weak signals. (This was with separate feeds
for each band.) The Cubix was well built, with good fiberglass spreaders.
However, even at its best, a quad is a physical challenge. It is a large
three-dimensional structure that can be very difficult for one person to
handle. The SteppIR is a two-dimensional object and much easier to handle.

My quad had a remote switch (Amertron) to switch one feed coax to each of
the five elements. This required a control cable for the switch. The SteppIR
needs a control cable for the stepping motors. They are about even in this
respect. The quad can be turned (and stopped) by a slightly smaller rotor.

My choice was the SteppIR on a crank-down/crank-over tower. In the long run,
the ease of maintenance (and playing with the antenna and other wires on the
tower) outweighed the lower price of the quad and the possibility of
slightly better reception in extreme cases.

Bill - W2WO



"Francis Pinson" wrote in message
...
Tks to read.

What is the best choice for 5 bands (10 to 20m) : 2L Steppir or 2L cubical
quad ?

What do you think about this ?..... It is for my holidays home...

Nice to read you ... Tks to all

Best 73/DX

Frank




J. Mc Laughlin August 6th 07 04:49 PM

2L Steppir or 2L Cubical quad
 
Dear Frank (no call, France?):

Another choice is a log-periodic-dipole-array (LPDA). Several are
available that do a good job of covering 14 MHz to 30 MHz. One such
manufacturer is Tennadyne

http://www.tennadyne.com/specs&prices.htm

The link shows the specifications of most of their models.

LPDAs have no moving parts and everything is in a plane. If you purchase
one, I can offer a couple of very simple (almost no cost) enhancements.

As I recall, Tennadyne has a distributor in your area.

73, Mac N8TT

--
J. Mc Laughlin; Michigan U.S.A.
Home:

"Francis Pinson" wrote in message
...
Tks to read.

What is the best choice for 5 bands (10 to 20m) : 2L Steppir or 2L cubical
quad ?

What do you think about this ?..... It is for my holidays home...

Nice to read you ... Tks to all

Best 73/DX

Frank






All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:28 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com