Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
measuring cable loss
"Owen Duffy" wrote in message ... Jim Lux wrote in news:f9gg4i$7q9$1 @nntp1.jpl.nasa.gov: ... Jim good points and all noted. Jimmie hasn't give a lot of detail about the specification he is apparently trying to meet. Reading between the lines, it might be an EIRP, and assuming a given antenna gain, he is trying to calculate the permitted transmitter power output. Not only is the uncertainty of practical service equipment an issue in tenth dB accuracy, but no mention has been made of transmission line loss under mismatch conditions, and mismatch loss. Jimmie, if you have a plausible story to tell the regulator, then that might suffice. If you have assessed the Return Loss of a rho=1 termination, then you could use that and the measured Forward and Reverse power using say a Bird 43 at the transmitter end of that known line loss (being half the return loss) to calculate the power absorbed by the load. The calculator at http://www.vk1od.net/tl/vswrc.php does just that. The calculator at http://www.vk1od.net/tl/tllc.php could be used to calculate the expected RL of the o/c or s/c line section, just specify a load impedance of 1e6 or 1e-6 for each case. For example, at 1GHz, the RL of 200' LDF4-50A with a 1e-6 load is 8.9dB, and if you got much higher than that, you might suspect the cable to be faulty. Tenths of a dB, remember that most service type power meters are probably good for 6% to 10% of FSD, so I will go with Jim's 1dB accuracy. BTW, directional wattmeters for the ham market are often not capable of reasonable accuracy on loads other than the nominal 50 ohm load. There are a range of tests that such an instrument should satisfy, but for hams, it is usually considered sufficient if the "reflected" reading is approximately zero on a 50 ohm load. Owen I think I have given enough info. But I will try yo expess it in another way. Power delivered to the antenna but be maintained with in +- 1 db in this case that power is 100 watts. Power is normally checked at the TX and recorded after allowing for line loss as "power at the antenna". Power checks are done on a weekly basis. Once a year the line loss is measured and this value is used to subtract from the power at the transmitter for the rest of the year. With this in mind it would be most prudent to measure the cable loss accurately. to establish the annual benchmark. Considering the test equipment I have available to use in a temperature stablized building an Agilent network analyzer or use an old HP power meter at the top of the tower I am thinking that measuring rho of the cable while terminated in a short may be the more accurate way to go. Jimmie |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Measuring quarter wave cable length with HP 8405A | Antenna | |||
Calculating Coaxial Cable Loss | Antenna | |||
Antenna cable loss query | Scanner | |||
Antenna cable loss query | Shortwave | |||
Measuring small inductances using a return loss bridge | Homebrew |