Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
K7ITM wrote in news:1186788470.852002.260460
@b79g2000hse.googlegroups.com: On Aug 10, 2:28 pm, Owen Duffy wrote: ... I don't think you can compensate for lack of f/b ratio in the coupler, for example because the coupled lines are too long. ... I'm curious what you mean by that, Owen... Tom, I was thinking of several instruments, all of the coupled lines type of construction, that on a s/c and o/c failed to indicate rho=1, and showed similar readings when physically reversed, suggesting it was not just a fwd / rev matching issue, there was something about the coupler that was too dependent on the location of the SWR pattern relative to the coupler. Since they worked better at lower frequencies, the length of the coupler was likely to be a contribution. Owen |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Measuring quarter wave cable length with HP 8405A | Antenna | |||
Calculating Coaxial Cable Loss | Antenna | |||
Antenna cable loss query | Scanner | |||
Antenna cable loss query | Shortwave | |||
Measuring small inductances using a return loss bridge | Homebrew |