Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#26
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 11, 1:37 am, Owen Duffy wrote:
K7ITM wrote roups.com: ... Tom, for avoidance of doubt, I am not talking about the type of directional coupler that uses a couple line and that you would terminate with matching load. I am talking about the cheap VSWR meters that have about 100mm long coupled line, that is quite tightly coupled, and the resistor at one end of the line is adjusted to balance the electric field sample with the magnetic field sample for a null reading with V/I=Zn. Owen Hi Owen, I'm not sure I see the difference. The load on the cheapie you describe is just the load required to terminate that line. I have a freely redistributable field solver program that will calculate the even and odd mode impedances for you from the geometry and the dielectric's permittivity, and from those impedances and the length you can predict the proper termination impedance of both the "through" and the "coupled" lines, and the coupling at any particular frequency. It IS a problem if you try to do it in microstrip because the propagation velocity for the even and odd modes is different, but in true TEM configurations, I believe the directionality is fine if you maintain uniform cross-section. Actually, a way that they make broadband coupled lines is to have a central section tightly coupled, and another section on each end of that which is less tightly coupled. You can extend it to 5 sections or more, to get even broader bandwidth. Info about them is out there, but it wasn't as easy for me to find as I figured it would be. ;-) Cheers, Tom |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Measuring quarter wave cable length with HP 8405A | Antenna | |||
Calculating Coaxial Cable Loss | Antenna | |||
Antenna cable loss query | Scanner | |||
Antenna cable loss query | Shortwave | |||
Measuring small inductances using a return loss bridge | Homebrew |