Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 13, 11:50 am, Jim Lux wrote:
John Ferrell wrote: On Thu, 9 Aug 2007 08:13:45 -0400, "Jimmie D" wrote: I need to measure the loss of aproximately 200ft of coax @ a freq of 1Ghz. The normal procedure for doing this is to inject a signal at one end and measure the power out at the other. Using available test eqipment this is a real pain to do. I propose to disconnect the cable at the top of the tower terminating it in either a short or open and measure the return loss at the source end. I have done this and measured 6.75 db and I am assuming that 1/2 of this would be the actual loss of the cable. These numbers do fall within the established norms for this cable. Can you think of a reason thiis method would not be valid? Jimmie This is way too complicated for me! My solution would be to build/buy an RF probe and permanently mount it at the top of the tower. Bring a pair of wires (Coax if you want it to look really professional) down to the bottom and measure it whenever or even all the time. Considering he needs sub 1dB accuracy, this is challenging..it would work if you assume your RF probe never needs calibration and is stable over the environmental range of interest. Not a trivial thing to do. A diode and a voltmeter certainly won't do it. (A typical diode detector might vary 1 dB over a 20 degree C range.. judging from the Krytar 700 series data sheet I have sitting here. Granted that's a microwave detector (100MHz to 40 GHz), but I'd expect similar from most other diodes. I've given the link to an Agilent Ap note that describes various detectors in excruciating detail. A diode, voltmeter, and temperature sensor might work, though. useful stuff athttp://rfdesign.com/mag/608RFDF2.pdfhttp://cp.literature.agilent.com/litweb/pdf/5966-0784E.pdf Seems like modern RF detector ICs offer much better stability than diodes. An AD8302, for example, has a typical +/- 0.25dB variation from -40C to +85C, with a -30dBm signal level. The temperature variation could be calibrated before installation; if necessary, an especially temperature-stable part could be selected from a batch. Then knowing the ambient within 20C would be sufficient. You'd need to arrange sampling at a low level, which could be a well-constructed 90 degree hybrid. With two channels in the AD8302, you could even monitor antenna reflection coefficient (including angle), and be aware of changes there. Analog Devices and Linear Technology both seem to be strong in the RF power monitor IC area. Cheers, Tom |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Measuring quarter wave cable length with HP 8405A | Antenna | |||
Calculating Coaxial Cable Loss | Antenna | |||
Antenna cable loss query | Scanner | |||
Antenna cable loss query | Shortwave | |||
Measuring small inductances using a return loss bridge | Homebrew |