John Smith I wrote:

Whatever mental disorder these guys have, I am afraid it may be caused
by rf--I am thinking of swearing off amateur radio and going wholly with
the net--before it is too late!

If you do, please consider swearing off the the amateur radio
newsgroups too while you're at it.

Much appreciated.

ac6xg

Jim Kelley wrote:

...
If you do, please consider swearing off the the amateur radio newsgroups
too while you're at it.

Much appreciated.

ac6xg



Jim:

:-)

JS

John Smith I wrote:
It is obivious they are nit-picking in an
endeavor to make you appear as an idiot;

People who say, "Everything is already known
about __________" have removed any doubt about
who is the idiot. :-)
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com

Cecil Moore wrote:

...
People who say, "Everything is already known
about __________" have removed any doubt about
who is the idiot. :-)

I am in total agreement, it is unfathomable, to me, how any could call
that shot different.

But here, in the rec.radio.amateur.antenna.twilight.zone ng, just the
EXACT OPPOSITE seems true.

Someone is an idiot, no doubt. If it is me, I certainly hope I can see
this shortly and stop making such an idiot out of myself!

If it is the others, I just hope they stop, shortly ...

Regards,
JS

Cecil Moore wrote:
John Smith I wrote:
It is obivious they are nit-picking in an endeavor to make you appear
as an idiot;

People who say, "Everything is already known
about __________" have removed any doubt about
who is the idiot. :-)

Sure enough, Cecil. I do think that continual suspension of disbelief is
in the same boat however.

It is a slippery slope some practice between healthy skepticism, and
trying to force rational people to keep their mouths shut about any new
theory no matter how crackpot it is.

When taken to its extreme, the practitioner ends up believing every
alternative theory, and is skeptical toward all established ones.

- 73 de Mike KB3EIA -

Michael Coslo wrote:

...
When taken to its extreme, the practitioner ends up believing every
alternative theory, and is skeptical toward all established ones.

- 73 de Mike KB3EIA -

I would have loved to have you and I present during the first Wright
brothers experiments in flight, the first research into developing
masers and lasers (buck rogers ray gun, really), the first reach into
interplanetary exploration, etc., etc., etc.

I could have prophesied your stand and arguments perfectly, they would
simply have appeared as they do now ...

The least you could do is fake an open mind ... just to fool us now and
then.

Regards,
JS

John Smith I wrote:
Michael Coslo wrote:

...
When taken to its extreme, the practitioner ends up believing every
alternative theory, and is skeptical toward all established ones.

- 73 de Mike KB3EIA -

I would have loved to have you and I present during the first Wright
brothers experiments in flight, the first research into developing
masers and lasers (buck rogers ray gun, really), the first reach into
interplanetary exploration, etc., etc., etc.


I could have prophesied your stand and arguments perfectly, they would
simply have appeared as they do now ...

The least you could do is fake an open mind ... just to fool us now and
then.


Why don't we move this into the realm of discussion rather that you
noting that you know exactly what I am going to do or say (some might
thing that is evidence itself of a closed mind)


What do you think about this Superluminal speed experiment in comparison
to the Smarandache hypothesis?

Tunneling time in itself is expected to be zero in superluminal
phenomena. Interesting.

F. Hund in 1927 noticed Tunneling in 1927. It is some pretty old
physics. It is also a natural outgrowth of quantum mechanics. It is
needed to explain how the sun works, and even the inflationary universe.

Your thoughts?



- 73 de Mike KB3EIA -