On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 15:26:46 -0700, John Smith I
wrote:

an endeavor to make you appear as an idiot

Odd how you choose your frame so carefully. The passive presumption
is truly evocative of wish-fulfillment. Sort of like "I'll hold your
coat while you beat them up" toadyist self contempt.

Got any more charmers like that scribbled in your secret diary?

Try reading the original text instead of relying on the Classics
Comics edition if you want your indignation to bluster more than Rocky
Balboa in a wheelchair.

Yeah, I know this was all for my benefit. ;-0

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Richard Clark wrote:
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 15:26:46 -0700, John Smith I
wrote:

an endeavor to make you appear as an idiot

Odd how you choose your frame so carefully. The passive presumption
is truly evocative of wish-fulfillment. Sort of like "I'll hold your
coat while you beat them up" toadyist self contempt.

Got any more charmers like that scribbled in your secret diary?

Try reading the original text instead of relying on the Classics
Comics edition if you want your indignation to bluster more than Rocky
Balboa in a wheelchair.

Yeah, I know this was all for my benefit. ;-0

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

My text is either true on not, it holds no secret knife, it is the
weapon itself. I am sure some may get lost in analysis ...

What I write only looks obvious to me, I simply offer my humble opinion,
it is either true, or not ... the world is a much better judge than
myself ...

Regards,
JS

On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 17:58:56 -0700, John Smith I
wrote:

My text is either true on not, it holds no secret knife, it is the
weapon itself.

Wow! Harlequin may sue you for copyright violation though. (Do they
have a Quantum Electrodynamics series for young romantics you've been
tipping into? Gives an entirely new spin on tunneling.)

Richard Clark wrote:

...
Wow! Harlequin may sue you for copyright violation though. (Do they
have a Quantum Electrodynamics series for young romantics you've been
tipping into? Gives an entirely new spin on tunneling.)

LOL! At least Harlequin doesn't reprint shakespeare!

As happens quite often, I view my "crystal ball" and I must agree to
disagree.

To me, it is quite clear, we have only kludged together "theories" and
equations which we slave with (but, are quite usable till better comes
along), we use these under the burden of great errors and unsolved
riddles ... to others, it may indeed appear as a finished work of art ...

Regards,
JS

John Smith I wrote:
To me, it is quite clear, we have only kludged together "theories" and
equations which we slave with (but, are quite usable till better comes
along), we use these under the burden of great errors and unsolved
riddles ... to others, it may indeed appear as a finished work of art ...

Doesn't it make complete sense for a single photon
to be able to pass through two slits at once and
interfere with itself on the other side? Even a
Buckyball made from many carbon atoms can do the
same thing. :-0
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com

Cecil Moore wrote:

... Even a
Buckyball made from many carbon atoms can do the
same thing. :-0

Cecil:

Do those Buckyballs come in larger sizes? My wife plays tennis, yanno? :-)

Regards,
JS

Richard Clark wrote:
Gives an entirely new spin on tunneling.

Strange quarks have a spin of -1/2
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com

On Sat, 18 Aug 2007 17:39:17 GMT, Cecil Moore
wrote:

Richard Clark wrote:
Gives an entirely new spin on tunneling.

Strange quarks have a spin of -1/2

And Harlequin has Fabio.

Richard Clark wrote:

...
73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Yanno, my first response, which preceded this one, was rather cryptic.
This link embodies my meaning:

http://blog.hamdems.org/archives/028648.html

Now, simply think of me as the guy who cries out, "These amateurs wear
NO clothes!"

Regards,
JS