Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old August 27th 07, 06:59 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,915
Default Is an Antenna Analyzer an FCC violation?

Jimmie D wrote:

...
I think I remember a test conducted to see how much power it would take to
communicate across the United States coast to coast. They started out making
the contact at near legal limit and were still able to detect the signal at
just a few milliwatts. As I remember a few was less than 10. I am sure this
was part of a ham magazine article from many years ago. perhaps someone else
here knows the details better than I.


Jimmie


It seems to me, many here have suggested there are "tons" of active hams
out there; some have even went so far as to claim the bands are "crowded."

Surely, taking in to account the above, the few brief milliwatts from an
analyzer are of no real consequence amongst this "rf pollution" ... and
ten milliwatts would never make it across such a country of such active
hams.

Regards,
JS

  #2   Report Post  
Old August 28th 07, 12:10 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2007
Posts: 38
Default Is an Antenna Analyzer an FCC violation?

John Smith writes:

It seems to me, many here have suggested there are "tons" of active
hams out there; some have even went so far as to claim the bands are
"crowded."


How crowded?

CQ WW DX contest 2005 received 4430 logs for SSB, 4100 for CW. We all
agree that these events increase activity on the HF bands many
fold. How many of these are actually transmitting at any given time?
1000? (A few may be transmitting and listening at the same time, but
there are many more who aren't active for the entire permitted period.)

So how many simultaneous transmissions are there on the HF bands when
there isn't a contest going on? Low hundreds seems more likely.

73
Jon (LA4RT)
  #3   Report Post  
Old August 28th 07, 05:54 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 828
Default Is an Antenna Analyzer an FCC violation?

Jon Kåre Hellan wrote:
John Smith writes:

It seems to me, many here have suggested there are "tons" of active
hams out there; some have even went so far as to claim the bands are
"crowded."


How crowded?

CQ WW DX contest 2005 received 4430 logs for SSB, 4100 for CW. We all
agree that these events increase activity on the HF bands many
fold. How many of these are actually transmitting at any given time?
1000? (A few may be transmitting and listening at the same time, but
there are many more who aren't active for the entire permitted period.)

So how many simultaneous transmissions are there on the HF bands when
there isn't a contest going on? Low hundreds seems more likely.



When I scan the bands, I hear quite a bit of activity. Those who have
problems hearing other folks should first check their antenna system.

- 73 de Mike KB3EIA -
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Antenna analyzer- no MW? chris Antenna 6 February 8th 06 07:15 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:16 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017