Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 13:02:24 -0700, Tim Shoppa
wrote: That is very, very interesting Danny. I appreciate the work you did and the beautiful pictures! I see your conclusion that the antenna must be at least a physical quarter wave on 40M and that matches exactly my sentiment (if not experience or knowledge) about building such a vertical. Do you have any pics/docs of the telescoping 35-foot whip? I've gotten pretty good with building wire antennas and hoisting them up into the sky but have to plead massive ignorance when it comes to whips etc. PY1BEK's lightweight tower config looks pretty sweet though! As explained in the text the minimum ¼-wavelength for fourty-meters was to achieve a good match on both bands. Any length from about 33' will 35' should be fine. There is on real advantage in having it physically resonate. That mast is an old military surplus item. I doubt if you could locate one today. They were used on PT boasts and some Coast Guard cutters from WWII through the 1950s. Today your best bet would be to use aluminum tubing or wire strung alongside one of the telescoping portable fiberglass masts on the market today. 73, Danny, K6MHE |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
GPA vs Vert dipole | Antenna | |||
vert vs dipole gut comparison | Antenna | |||
vert dipole vs vert | Antenna | |||
vert vs dipole | Antenna | |||
6m vert dipole | Antenna |