Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, you all pretty much confirmed my suspicions. I may try to set up
a dipole low to the ground NVIS style, but I know it's probably a waste of time. I have a great time experimenting with shortwave antennas (although my neighbors are going crazy wondering what I'm doing) and haven't had much luck on 10 meters there, either. My friend's setup is doing incredible things with 20 meters, but they're all 1200+ miles away too. I have a beautiful old Kenwood HF rig that I'm preparing to set up now. Guess I had better start thinking about lower frequency antennas. Thanks for the advice, it is much appreciated! On Sep 15, 12:38 pm, Cecil Moore wrote: Dave Oldridge wrote: You will not get a consistent path on 10m of 300 miles without some pretty expensive antenna hardware and high power. Just cannot be done. How about moon bounce? :-) You'd actually get off cheaper trying to do it on 2m SSB (which would probably work OK if you stacked two yagis one over the other and fed them with a good amp). Which reminds me of something that nobody seems to have mentioned. If a QSO is the only goal, satellite communications should work well if not too crowded. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 15, 12:05 pm, Denno wrote:
Yes, you all pretty much confirmed my suspicions. I may try to set up a dipole low to the ground NVIS style, but I know it's probably a waste of time. I think you would be better off with a good vertical or ground plane. There is not much point in running the typical "NVIS" antenna on 10m. There will be very few cases where the signal actually goes straight up and down. Just doesn't happen on 10 much. A low dipole will be the pits for most of the usual paths you would work on 10m. It will be semi ok working skywave across the country, but the good ground plane would likely be even better. Probably by several db... The ground/space wave with the low dipole will be half useless, and much of the activity you will find on 10 will be fairly local at times. In this case, the GP will smoke the dipole. I used to hang out on 10 a lot several years ago, and if I had to choose a single simple antenna, I'd use a good vertical or ground plane as high as I could get it. This will give the best overall performance for all the types of paths you will likely work on 10m. If you did get some short skip going, which is more likely to be back scatter, or aurora, etc, the vertical will still do the job as most will still be at a fairly low overall angles, unlike the typical NVIS on 80m, etc.. There is very little true NVIS on 10m. The skip zone is too long, even when it's short for 10.. MK |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
2m omnis and radiation takeoff angles - importance | Antenna | |||
radiation angles | Antenna | |||
Need schematic or technical info on EBERLINE PAC-ISAGA alpha radiation meter | Equipment | |||
Need schematic or technical info on EBERLINE PAC-ISAGA alpha radiation meter | Equipment | |||
Incoming radiation angles | Antenna |