Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Probably a stupid question, but...
Anyone have any idea as to the probable performance characteristics of two
whip 40" whip antennas mounted approx. six inches apart, and used for receiving shortwave, primarily between 6 MHz and 12 MHz? Would they be more receptive to a signal approaching f/b, as opposed to s/s? Just wondering... Hoping someone can offer some advice as to whether they would be in any way directional. Thanks for any replies, Dave |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Probably a stupid question, but...
Dave wrote:
Anyone have any idea as to the probable performance characteristics of two whip 40" whip antennas mounted approx. six inches apart, and used for receiving shortwave, primarily between 6 MHz and 12 MHz? Would they be more receptive to a signal approaching f/b, as opposed to s/s? Just wondering... Hoping someone can offer some advice as to whether they would be in any way directional. They would be directional at the frequency where 6 inches is 1/8 wavelength. :-) -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Probably a stupid question, but...
"Cecil Moore" wrote in message news Dave wrote: Anyone have any idea as to the probable performance characteristics of two whip 40" whip antennas mounted approx. six inches apart, and used for receiving shortwave, primarily between 6 MHz and 12 MHz? Would they be more receptive to a signal approaching f/b, as opposed to s/s? Just wondering... Hoping someone can offer some advice as to whether they would be in any way directional. They would be directional at the frequency where 6 inches is 1/8 wavelength. :-) -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com Hey Cecil, thanks for the reply. Hmm. So, correct me if I'm wrong, but from what you're saying they would actually have some directional characteristics at approx. 2.5 MHz. What if I angled them apart at, say, 45 degrees? That would, I think, put the tops about 57 inches apart, and the two whips at right angles to each other. Any ideas what that would do? Or, if I flattened them out in opposite directions? I need an ARRL Antenna Handbook, only I wouldn't know what to look up... Do appreciate your reply. Gives me something to think about... Dave |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Probably a stupid question, but...
"Dave" wrote in message ... "Cecil Moore" wrote in message news Dave wrote: Anyone have any idea as to the probable performance characteristics of two whip 40" whip antennas mounted approx. six inches apart, and used for receiving shortwave, primarily between 6 MHz and 12 MHz? Would they be more receptive to a signal approaching f/b, as opposed to s/s? Just wondering... Hoping someone can offer some advice as to whether they would be in any way directional. They would be directional at the frequency where 6 inches is 1/8 wavelength. :-) -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com Hey Cecil, thanks for the reply. Hmm. So, correct me if I'm wrong, but from what you're saying they would actually have some directional characteristics at approx. 2.5 MHz. I don't get that number at all. Splitting the difference between 6 and 12 Mhz, say 9 Mhz, an 1/8th wavelength distance would be about 4 meters. Anybody have a url of a page that shows receive pattern of two antennas at different spacings, 1/8, 1/4, 3/8, 1/2 wavelengths? Dave, I recommend you download the demo version of EZNEC, it won't take to long to model a couple of verticals at different spacing. Mike |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Probably a stupid question, but...
amdx wrote:
I don't get that number at all. Yep, Dave was off by a couple of magnitudes. 6 inches is 1/8WL at 246 MHz. Anybody have a url of a page that shows receive pattern of two antennas at different spacings, 1/8, 1/4, 3/8, 1/2 wavelengths? My 1980's ARRL Antenna Book has those patterns using different phasings and different spacings. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Probably a stupid question, but...
"Cecil Moore" wrote in message . net... amdx wrote: I don't get that number at all. Yep, Dave was off by a couple of magnitudes. 6 inches is 1/8WL at 246 MHz. Anybody have a url of a page that shows receive pattern of two antennas at different spacings, 1/8, 1/4, 3/8, 1/2 wavelengths? My 1980's ARRL Antenna Book has those patterns using different phasings and different spacings. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com Dave doesn't have the book, still looking for a url. Mike |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Probably a stupid question, but...
Dave wrote:
"Cecil Moore" wrote in message They would be directional at the frequency where 6 inches is 1/8 wavelength. :-) -- Hmm. So, correct me if I'm wrong, but from what you're saying they would actually have some directional characteristics at approx. 2.5 MHz. Make that 250 MHz. If 6 inches is 1/8WL, then one wavelength would be 4 feet. 984/4 = 250 MHz. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Probably a stupid question, but...
"Dave" wrote in
: Anyone have any idea as to the probable performance characteristics of two whip 40" whip antennas mounted approx. six inches apart, and used for receiving shortwave, primarily between 6 MHz and 12 MHz? Would they be more receptive to a signal approaching f/b, as opposed to s/s? Just wondering... Hoping someone can offer some advice as to whether they would be in any way directional. If they are simply in parallel, they would not have much directivity. But if one were to be phase-inverted with respect the other, there would be a strong null along the bisector of the line joining them. The gain at 9mhz is on the order of -30dbi, though so you will need a good receiver or even a preamp. -- Dave Oldridge+ ICQ 1800667 |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Probably a stupid question, but...
"Dave Oldridge" wrote in message 9... "Dave" wrote in : Anyone have any idea as to the probable performance characteristics of two whip 40" whip antennas mounted approx. six inches apart, and used for receiving shortwave, primarily between 6 MHz and 12 MHz? Would they be more receptive to a signal approaching f/b, as opposed to s/s? Just wondering... Hoping someone can offer some advice as to whether they would be in any way directional. If they are simply in parallel, they would not have much directivity. But if one were to be phase-inverted with respect the other, there would be a strong null along the bisector of the line joining them. The gain at 9mhz is on the order of -30dbi, though so you will need a good receiver or even a preamp. -- Dave Oldridge+ ICQ 1800667 Aha! A strong (or deep) null! That's actually what I'm looking for. So, what would I look up to start learning how to set one up as phase-inverted? I have a copy of Joe Carr's Antenna Handbook (think that's the title), would it have anything on such a setup, do you think? What would I look for in the ARRL Antenna Handbook? Does this type of setup have a name to search on? And yes, compared to my 110' longwire, the signal is miniscule. But I'm working on that. Thank you so much, Dave, for this input. Now I have some idea as to what I am looking for, (I *think*). Much appreciated. Dave Beane |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Probably a stupid question, but...
Trying to phase two antennas that close together at that frequency range
will be an educational experience at best, but more likely just an exercise in frustration unless you have much more patience than average. Such an array will be hyper-sensitive to everything. You might be able to fleetingly see a null after a lot of tweaking, but I seriously doubt you'll even get that. A tiny change in frequency, wiggling of the whips, or even movement in the vicinity of the whips will have a profound effect on any null you might see. If a null from a small antenna is what you want, you'd have much better luck with a carefully constructed and balanced ("shielded") loop. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|