Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 20 Sep, 22:39, Roy Lewallen wrote:
Trying to phase two antennas that close together at that frequency range will be an educational experience at best, but more likely just an exercise in frustration unless you have much more patience than average. Such an array will be hyper-sensitive to everything. You might be able to fleetingly see a null after a lot of tweaking, but I seriously doubt you'll even get that. A tiny change in frequency, wiggling of the whips, or even movement in the vicinity of the whips will have a profound effect on any null you might see. If a null from a small antenna is what you want, you'd have much better luck with a carefully constructed and balanced ("shielded") loop. Roy Lewallen, W7EL If it was just for receiving I would make two antennas in coil fashion as shown every where on the net, connect them together with a half wave length coax and try stretch them apart as much as room suplies and then roll the excess phasing coax up. The cb's have the super scanner antenna that partialy follows this principle using 1 wave length antennas with the connecting coax folded and pushed inside the connecting aluminum channel. Using a rolled antenna tesla style with them being physically close together would be an interesting experiment. Look up in the net home made radios for the station tuning method and also you might want to choose different methods to connect them starting with a wire connecting the two wound antennas at the top and feeding th bottom! ( that method by the way requires the two antennas to be wound inopposite directions) I imagine you could get a null just like turning an inside tv antenna because these stations in this frequencyare high power as can be seen when a rogue station opens up ontop of the station that you are listenning to and want to null out of the picture. Have fun Art KB9MZ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|